| Author | Thread |
|
|
04/26/2007 01:03:49 AM · #26 |
The point in case you missed it was no where does it say that photo was DQed because of adding an effect, which is the point of this thread. So I don't see the relevancy in bringing that photo up unless the reason for the DQ is incorrect on that photo.
Message edited by author 2007-04-26 01:04:15. |
|
|
|
04/26/2007 01:12:53 AM · #27 |
Originally posted by yanko:
I don't see the relevancy in bringing that photo up unless the reason for the DQ is incorrect on that photo. |
That is the exactly the question.
|
|
|
|
04/26/2007 01:54:23 AM · #28 |
Originally posted by yanko:
So you're saying you didn't spot edit the photo like the DQ states? |
no Richard, i didn't do spot-editing.
i was explained that the photo breached the "creating something that wasn't there" clause at the time (the rules were slightly different back then, remember "major elements rule"?). that photo sucked in score so i'm not really sad that it got DQ'ed but it really stops me from trying any new tricks that are not proven to be legal ever since :p i'm a good law-abiding DPC citizen now, hehe. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/31/2025 02:02:53 AM EDT.
