| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/29/2004 10:25:25 AM · #26 |
I think that showing some pubic hair does not go against any of the rules. If that was the case DRJONES would've been asked to leave this site. There is also a pic in the nudity category called "Apple Shavings" or something like that that shows hair.
|
|
|
|
01/07/2011 08:41:39 PM · #27 |
Natator.
Ok, I read this some time ago long before joining but was unsure whether to reply, given this is a 13+ site, not an adult one. But you guys all seem a discerning lot and my point is medical rather than adult. I am the fly in the ointment. Hope you are still around 7 years on!
Ok, so here goes.....
The rule in question is, "Photos must not "show a penis or a vagina".
Well..... I was born with no genitalia, no penis, no testes. Penile agenesis made me one in 20 million male births. I am not female so I don't have the other stuff either. Yeh, I have fielded endless abuse, but I have learned to return it all with heavy topspin! I am still here and I am who I am. Naturists have accepted me as just another guy on a beach, so I'm well cool with myself. Ironic that I am happiest where my "disability" is at its most visible and vulnerable.
But my point here is, if images are only banned if they "show a penis or a vagina".........
Surely then my full-frontal naturist photos are acceptable as exceptions to the rule. I have nothing to show that you won't find on a Ken doll! I already had a senior London police officer declare that I could not even be arrested if I walked down the street naked lol.
What are you guys' views on this and does it make a mockery of the ruling here?
Rgarcia. Happy Nude Rear! (LMAO, I been saving that one up!)
We naturists are the only moral people left, the only community where kids and women are relatively safe! Mainstream society has degenerated into a hive of sexual O.C.D., where 90%+ people cannot see that their near 24/7 obsession with sex is not biologically supported. This is why relationships are doomed from the start, because, unlike those affairs of our parents and forbears, they are based nearly entirely on sex. We naturists "see it every day". So we are more psychologically sound in our reaction to nudity. Hence we are more "family" orientated.
The simple fact is that people who "criminalise" nudity are in fact perverts. Someone who thinks of sex as soon as he sees nudity is surely a danger to his (nude) kids in the bath!!!!!
If these people are hurt by that fact, that is what the truth does!
In the US, "Nudity without more" is protected by Supreme Court ruling.
So, it seems, am I!
Message edited by author 2011-01-07 20:46:23. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 08:46:10 PM · #28 |
Always throws me off when these ancient threads get ressurected....
Welcom Will, your bio is, um.....interesting. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 08:52:32 PM · #29 |
Thanxxx Smardaz!
It seems paradoxically that my biggest handicap here is not my anatomy but my lack of a camera. Good grief!
I have taken some really good stuff on my camphone but I cannot enter it is a Challenge because I have to have a listed camera model first.
I suppose it is technically a kind of discrimination on a small scale. You just can't bloody win, can you?
Hugz, Will |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 09:21:41 PM · #30 |
I am not using advanced idiot-proof technology to cover up a lack of talent like 90% of photographers.
LOL, how to piss off 90% of photographers, here, before you even start participating!!! lol |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 10:21:26 PM · #31 |
Update.
Karmat already sorted out my cam-or-no-cam problem, before I even finished my coffee! They don't half blitz yo backfield fast in here! Play action........
Message edited by author 2011-01-07 22:21:53. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 10:21:47 PM · #32 |
| Welcome, Will! I like you already! I have a feeling things are going to get very exciting around here :-) |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 10:23:59 PM · #33 |
| Glad the camera phone registry is sorted. Was going to suggest that. Welcome to the caucus race, Will. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 10:24:51 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by tanguera:
...I have a feeling things are going to get very exciting around here :-) |
RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTT!
I give it a month. :-)
|
|
|
|
01/07/2011 10:26:00 PM · #35 |
Wow. This WILL be interesting. Welcome aboard, thread-necromancer-on-a-mission :-)
R. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 10:28:12 PM · #36 |
Sorry JulieNN.
I spent 40+ years being bullied. Now, having learned to read'n'react, I like to get my retaliation in first, LOL! |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 10:30:30 PM · #37 |
I like the people in here.
Damn! That's not a very good start is it? |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 10:38:28 PM · #38 |
I like you already  willgolden. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 10:52:53 PM · #39 |
Originally posted by dacrazyrn:
Originally posted by tanguera:
...I have a feeling things are going to get very exciting around here :-) |
RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTT!
I give it a month. :-) |
Would that be National Ken Doll Month?
Will, based on your flickr account, you have a good eye. I hope you participate in challenges. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 11:07:35 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
Will, based on your flickr account, you have a good eye. I hope you participate in challenges. |
Really? MmmmmmmKay! I'm just seeing the snapshots of him naked. Does that phone have a timer?
|
|
|
|
01/07/2011 11:24:56 PM · #41 |
Originally posted by dacrazyrn:
Originally posted by posthumous:
Will, based on your flickr account, you have a good eye. I hope you participate in challenges. |
Really? MmmmmmmKay! I'm just seeing the snapshots of him naked. Does that phone have a timer? |
I can't find those shots, but to be fair I probably wasn't looking as intently as you did. |
|
|
|
01/08/2011 12:56:10 AM · #42 |
Originally posted by coolhar:
....
(viii) encourages or depicts the use of drugs, alcohol or cigarettes or (ix) is generally offensive or in bad taste." .... |
Holy crap, that's like, I dunno, about 30 images I can think of right away, and probably many, many more - that need to be disqualified..
Basically by those rules, anyone smoking, drinking, using drugs, or even a photo just of the drugs, or tobacco products, or alcohol (had to believe we had an Absolute challenge isn't it??) is actually able to be disqualified..
I think they should enforce this today, and suffer the outrage, or remove it from the freaking rules, that's absolutely not how things actually work.
Message edited by author 2011-01-08 00:56:25. |
|
|
|
01/08/2011 03:20:54 AM · #43 |
Originally posted by willgolden:
Ok, so here goes..... |
Slippy, is that you??? |
|
|
|
01/08/2011 06:15:35 AM · #44 |
Originally posted by willgolden:
I like the people in here.
Damn! That's not a very good start is it? |
I don't know... you annoy me already. But then again, so do plenty of other people on this site. So you fit right in!! :D
Welcome.
|
|
|
|
01/08/2011 08:42:02 AM · #45 |
Originally posted by coryboehne:
Originally posted by coolhar:
....
(viii) encourages or depicts the use of drugs, alcohol or cigarettes or (ix) is generally offensive or in bad taste." .... |
Holy crap, that's like, I dunno, about 30 images I can think of right away, and probably many, many more - that need to be disqualified..
Basically by those rules, anyone smoking, drinking, using drugs, or even a photo just of the drugs, or tobacco products, or alcohol (had to believe we had an Absolute challenge isn't it??) is actually able to be disqualified..
I think they should enforce this today, and suffer the outrage, or remove it from the freaking rules, that's absolutely not how things actually work. |
 I'm sorry damn-it err darn-it. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/12/2025 12:49:29 AM EDT.
