DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register) 
 

DPChallenge Forums >> General Discussion >> Loose and lose are not the same!
Pages:  
Showing posts 51 - 75 of 169, (reverse)
AuthorThread
 03/30/2007 04:40:09 PM · #51
I think people are taking this thread a bit too serious. It began as a casual posting of grammar pet peeves. No one was attacking anyone or calling anyone stupid. Sheesh.
 03/30/2007 04:40:42 PM · #52
One of my closest friends uses the word "loose" instead of "lose" all the time among other things yet that hasn't stopped him from getting ahead. I guess those multiple degrees including a masters in business/economics and his hard work might have something to do with it. However, the more I think about it the more I feel he could have gotten further if only he had used the word "lose" when he meant "loose"!
 03/30/2007 04:41:34 PM · #53
I just have one request: PUHLEASE ... spell it LENS and not LENSE. Pretty please? :-)

One lens, two lenses.


03/30/2007 04:41:58 PM · #54
Originally posted by mark_u_U:
Originally posted by tooohip:
I do however, find whining about it in a forum to be a bit ridiculous.


I agree with this for internet forums in general. I agree even stronger in the case of a forum where not all participants are native speakers.

I often get the feeling that grammar-whiners either have noting else on their hands (get a life guys) or finally found something that they ARE good at.


I'm pretty sure I said that I have nothing else on my hands. (Actually I inplied it, but apparently you did not infer the same...) ;)
 03/30/2007 04:44:53 PM · #55
Originally posted by krafty1:
I think people are taking this thread a bit too serious. It began as a casual posting of grammar pet peeves. No one was attacking anyone or calling anyone stupid. Sheesh.


Quite true.

I'm only having fun.

Truth is I love photography, but my grammer is better than my pitcher-takin'

(sighs heavily...)
 03/30/2007 04:45:02 PM · #56
Originally posted by dwterry:
I just have one request: PUHLEASE ... spell it LENS and not LENSE. Pretty please? :-)

One lens, two lenses.


actually...
 03/30/2007 04:47:28 PM · #57
Originally posted by dwterry:
I just have one request: PUHLEASE ... spell it LENS and not LENSE. Pretty please? :-)

One lens, two lenses.


I was then going to offer the same advice.
I guess I am two slow.
 03/30/2007 04:49:15 PM · #58
Originally posted by Megatherian:
Originally posted by dwterry:
I just have one request: PUHLEASE ... spell it LENS and not LENSE. Pretty please? :-)

One lens, two lenses.


actually...


OK.

Having read only a couple of entries in the attached thread (and now therefore an expert on all things considered..) If the Atlantic Ocean is a "pond" ...

What is that little splotch of water behind my parents house?
 03/30/2007 04:52:54 PM · #59
Right
So I really just wanted an opportunity to use the word "splotch."

..
 03/30/2007 04:57:16 PM · #60
Originally posted by krafty1:
I think people are taking this thread a bit too serious. It began as a casual posting of grammar pet peeves. No one was attacking anyone or calling anyone stupid. Sheesh.


What? People are calling others stupid? Dang, I missed that one... ;-)
 03/30/2007 05:00:46 PM · #61
I think it's generally pretty obvious when English is not your first language. The patterning is different, the word choices slightly different from the American vernacular. I think you're reading a bit too much into it. I'm talking about when you're from Chicago, write like a second grader, and somehow expect to be taken seriously.

And yes, this thread has gone WAY off its initial track and I'm sorry for my part in that. Hello, my name is Becky, and I'm a grammar Nazi. ;-)
 03/30/2007 05:01:15 PM · #62
Originally posted by thomaspeople:
If the Atlantic Ocean is a "pond" ...

What is that little splotch of water behind my parents house?


A puddle.
 03/30/2007 05:01:24 PM · #63


DPC should implement a spell/grammer checker when composing a new forum message. Technically, it shouldn't be that hard to do. Many other forums have at least spell-checking capability.


03/30/2007 05:03:53 PM · #64
Use firefox if you want a spell checker. There's an add-on and it works great.
 03/30/2007 05:05:22 PM · #65
Google toolbar has one too - to - tooooooo! :-P
 03/30/2007 05:20:43 PM · #66
I cant bring myslef to use the short cuts when texting on the phone. Being a migrant, Mum always told us kidsw how important it was to speak and write properly. I dont care if others use it as long as they know the correct way to write. Also wen people dont talk properly how will they ever spell properly. Some people 'arks' a question about a 'pacific' subject.

Message edited by author 2007-03-30 17:21:14.
 03/30/2007 05:22:29 PM · #67
Originally posted by lesgainous:
DPC should implement a spell/grammer checker when composing a new forum message. Technically, it shouldn't be that hard to do. Many other forums have at least spell-checking capability.


You mean something like this?

------------------------------------------------------

DPC_FORUM_CHECKER Initialized...

Retrieving Post...
Verifying...
Errors Found...
Incorrect Spelling: "grammer" & Unnecessary use of: "-"
Processing Corrections...
Updating Forum Post...
Updating User Profile Stat: Spelling/Grammar Mistakes Counter...
Refreshing Page...

Originally posted by lesgainous:
DPC should implement a spell/grammar checker when composing a new forum message. Technically, it shouldn't be that hard to do. Many other forums have at least spell checking capability.

Message edited by: System. Corrections made for spelling and grammar. Lesgainous has been penalized 2 points for violating the spelling/grammar code


Message edited by author 2007-03-30 17:25:04.
 03/30/2007 05:24:56 PM · #68
Oh yes, that's my biggest pet peeve.

Originally posted by larryslights:
One I really hate...

"I should of done that...."

I should HAVE done that. HAVE HAVE HAVE
03/30/2007 05:31:09 PM · #69
Another pet peeve:
"very unique"
"more unique"
"less unique"

...you get the idea. Here's the problem: Something is either unique or it is not. Uniqueness does not exist in degrees. If something is unique, it is the only one of its kind; it can't be more or less than anything if it's the only one. Item A could be more or less unusual or innovative or creative or original than Item B, but it can't be more or less unique.
03/30/2007 05:37:22 PM · #70
Originally posted by Monique64:
I cant bring myslef to use the short cuts when texting on the phone. Being a migrant, Mum always told us kidsw how important it was to speak and write properly. I dont care if others use it as long as they know the correct way to write. Also wen people dont talk properly how will they ever spell properly. Some people 'arks' a question about a 'pacific' subject.


... and talk about Chicargo.
 03/30/2007 05:38:10 PM · #71
Originally posted by Rebecca:
Another pet peeve:
"very unique"
"more unique"
"less unique"

...you get the idea. Here's the problem: Something is either unique or it is not. Uniqueness does not exist in degrees. If something is unique, it is the only one of its kind; it can't be more or less than anything if it's the only one. Item A could be more or less unusual or innovative or creative or original than Item B, but it can't be more or less unique.


I'm reporting you to the ADL (Adverb Defamation League) for your extremely unique view on this word.


03/30/2007 05:44:22 PM · #72
I'm loving this thread!

Rebecca, I agree with all you have said! The example below is classic and crops up rather frequently.

Originally posted by Rebecca:
Another pet peeve:
"very unique"
"more unique"
"less unique"

...you get the idea. Here's the problem: Something is either unique or it is not. Uniqueness does not exist in degrees. If something is unique, it is the only one of its kind; it can't be more or less than anything if it's the only one. Item A could be more or less unusual or innovative or creative or original than Item B, but it can't be more or less unique.
03/30/2007 05:52:33 PM · #73
THANK YOU! i've been wanting to whinge about this for ages, but haven't had the guts. yes, i know i type with no capitals; that's just laziness on my part. but i do use correct grammar, and even go back and correct any typos in comments and posts if i catch them after posting. i guess the bibliophile/pedant/teacher in me will just never die.

why is grammar and clear linguisitc expression important?
Politics and the English Language - George Orwell, 1946
This is a fascinating and important essay that everyone, in this age of spin and sound bites should read.

pet peeve, of many - adjectives used as nouns, and vice versa: female is an adjective. a female athlete, a female cat, etc. it is not a noun! woman is a noun. therefore, a woman lawyer is wrong! it should be a female lawyer.

sorry. it drives me absolutely batty.

rebecca, thomaspeople, et al. i agree wholeheartedly

Message edited by author 2007-03-30 17:52:57.
 03/30/2007 06:05:40 PM · #74
If we're talking about grammar and correct usage, shouldn't we be talking about spelling checkers?

Aren't spell checkers used at Hogwarts?
 03/30/2007 06:11:51 PM · #75
Originally posted by Megatherian:
Originally posted by dwterry:
I just have one request: PUHLEASE ... spell it LENS and not LENSE. Pretty please? :-)

One lens, two lenses.


actually...


If you read more than the first few posts in that thread then it becomes clear that "lens" is the only correct spelling after all.

And yes, lose vs. loose pisses me off as well. I think it's made worse by the fact that the words are pronounced so differently.

splidge
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/08/2025 10:11:10 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/08/2025 10:11:10 AM EDT.