Author | Thread |
|
03/20/2007 12:32:02 PM · #26 |
Thanks! Good tips to remember. Someday I want to get another shot of the moon over DC.
Plus, now I have one more reason to want an SLR. :) My camera doesn't do RAW.
|
|
|
03/20/2007 01:02:52 PM · #27 |
My moon. Used a 400mm to compress the distance. Can't wait to try it with a 2x adapter that I'm planning on getting. :)
 |
|
|
03/20/2007 01:04:46 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by rob_banks: My moon. Used a 400mm to compress the distance. Can't wait to try it with a 2x adapter that I'm planning on getting. :)
|
Seriously great shot. Great example of my strategy number 2 from previous message. |
|
|
03/20/2007 01:23:08 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by rob_banks: My moon. Used a 400mm to compress the distance. Can't wait to try it with a 2x adapter that I'm planning on getting. :) |
Very nice -- made me realize that my camera is about a 400mm equivalent : ) |
|
|
03/20/2007 01:29:22 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by strangeghost: Originally posted by rob_banks: My moon. Used a 400mm to compress the distance. Can't wait to try it with a 2x adapter that I'm planning on getting. :)
|
Seriously great shot. Great example of my strategy number 2 from previous message. |
Thanks!!! I've been wanting to experiment with moon timing more, too. I'd like to get it fuller (more full?) :) |
|
|
03/20/2007 01:31:46 PM · #31 |
"Nearer to full" is how I'd describe it. : ) |
|
|
03/20/2007 01:33:56 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by GeneralE: Originally posted by rob_banks: My moon. Used a 400mm to compress the distance. Can't wait to try it with a 2x adapter that I'm planning on getting. :) |
Very nice -- made me realize that my camera is about a 400mm equivalent : ) |
Huh. When I put mine up next to a DSLR with a 300mm lens, the frame was pretty similar. Don't the S2 IS and S3 IS have the same lens?
|
|
|
03/20/2007 01:43:55 PM · #33 |
According to DPReview.com, the long end of the zoom is 432mm, and probably to a smaller sensor (6MP) than a dSLR. |
|
|
03/20/2007 01:45:33 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by GeneralE: "Nearer to full" is how I'd describe it. : ) |
Thank you! You are a master vocabularietician. |
|
|
03/20/2007 01:48:19 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by GeneralE: According to DPReview.com, the long end of the zoom is 432mm, and probably to a smaller sensor (6MP) than a dSLR. |
Oh, I know what it says - that's based on a 6x field of view multiplier, simply from the fact the sensor is 1/6 full frame (physical dimensions matter here, not pixel counts). But when it was side-by-side with a DSLR ( Rex's, I think), the frame was almost identical, fully zoomed, to his at 300mm.
Then again, maybe his has a multiplier, too.
That's the problem with comparing focal lengths across different cameras - the same lens on different SLRs has different effective zooms.
Anyway, I was interested that you seemed to get a frame similar to what happened at 400mm.
Aren't super-zoom P&S cameras great? :)
Message edited by author 2007-03-20 13:49:07.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/12/2025 07:25:47 PM EDT.