Author | Thread |
|
03/11/2007 10:05:40 PM · #1 |
i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. |
|
|
03/11/2007 10:09:09 PM · #2 |
Yes I can and this has been done before.
Ray |
|
|
03/11/2007 10:27:13 PM · #3 |
Not only can i read it i can hear your retarted self pronouncing it the way its spelled. |
|
|
03/11/2007 10:29:41 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by RainMotorsports: Not only can i read it i can hear your retarted self pronouncing it the way its spelled. |
amazing, lol - though i merely copied & pasted those from an email. |
|
|
03/11/2007 10:43:51 PM · #5 |
Yeah, that's pretty amazing. I can read it at almost full speed with full comprehension.
I have seen it before, but it's one of those things that never ceases to amaze... so thanks for posting it. |
|
|
03/11/2007 10:57:58 PM · #6 |
It's also an urban myth.
The "discovery" has many sources, quite often it's "people say"... it's been passed around the internet as fact for years and years. |
|
|
03/11/2007 11:01:35 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by chimericvisions: It's also an urban myth.
The "discovery" has many sources, quite often it's "people say"... it's been passed around the internet as fact for years and years. |
and that is the reason why i have omitted the "researched by" portion of the article. i still think it's an interesting thing :) |
|
|
03/11/2007 11:03:00 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by crayon: and that is the reason why i have omitted the "researched by" portion of the article. i still think it's an interesting thing :) |
It is interesting, but the complexity of the words being used is always pretty low, and it's far from fallible. Many times the words can spell several different things. |
|
|
03/11/2007 11:10:12 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by chimericvisions: Originally posted by crayon: and that is the reason why i have omitted the "researched by" portion of the article. i still think it's an interesting thing :) |
It is interesting, but the complexity of the words being used is always pretty low, and it's far from fallible. Many times the words can spell several different things. |
yes, and i think it is related to how the human mind "fill things in", similarly to how our vision works. |
|
|
03/11/2007 11:39:58 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by crayon: Originally posted by RainMotorsports: Not only can i read it i can hear your retarted self pronouncing it the way its spelled. |
amazing, lol - though i merely copied & pasted those from an email. |
So, you are spamming all of us here at DPC? :-(
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/17/2025 09:04:28 AM EDT.