| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/23/2007 10:27:15 PM · #1 |
I recently was hired to shoot a group of three weddings as a second photographer by a studio who liked my work I did for a fashion shoot.
www.notinabox.com/stylemax
I didnt have a fast lens to cover the range of 70-300 or so, so I purchased my first L lens The 70-200 2.8 USM. I didnt opt for the IS since it was considerably more and this will be my first 3 weddings. I will be able to cover the cost of the lens with the pay from the weddings so am hoping it was a good purchase. $1114.95 for the lens new.
Ack, thats allot of cash.
|
|
|
|
02/28/2007 02:31:34 PM · #2 |
Yes, it's a pile of money, but that's a wonderful lens.
The most i've spent on a lens was last october, $725 for a canon 10-22. In March I'm getting the 17-55 2.8IS for about a $1000. Then later this year hopefully the 70-200 2.8 IS.
Need a Sigma 18-50 2.8?
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/02/2025 04:24:43 PM EDT.
