| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/16/2007 05:40:09 PM · #1 |
Looks similar to Photographer's Direct, but with a much cleaner site design and interface.
Curious about traffic/downloads, success, etc.
|
|
|
|
02/16/2007 05:42:34 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 05:43:43 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by karmat:
link-o? |
Heh ... figured the name would be enough. ;-)
photoshelter.com
Message edited by author 2007-02-16 17:44:01.
|
|
|
|
02/16/2007 07:14:04 PM · #4 |
| Seems like both a "Web Hosting" application with a monthly fee as well as an agency which charges commission. Do other such RM sites "double dip" like this? It's like pBase with an agency snap on. |
|
|
|
02/16/2007 07:16:35 PM · #5 |
According to their About Us page - they began as an archiving facility and now offer some buy / sell capability. But that isn't the same as a stock library. I would assume traffic would be much lower and therefore sales would be slow. I also didn't see any mention of them advertising which leads me to believe the traffic that would view your images would be mostly the traffic you drive there. There are primarily set up for archiving large #s of images safely.
|
|
|
|
02/18/2007 07:41:36 AM · #6 |
I have been using PS for about 8months...moved from DigitalRailroad.
Both are not an agency and they are not similar to PD in any way.
They charge you for hosting your images YOU should do the marketing.They do not market or sell your images so they do not act as an Agent. They both stated as a Storage solution . It is a very good platform for selling both RM and RF as well as prints.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/26/2025 08:42:01 AM EDT.
