| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 07:02:46 PM · #1 | 
		| | I am going to africa soon and I am looking for a telephoto zoom lense for the safari's I will be going on.  I am currently looking at the sigma 70-300.  I was curious of what you thought of that? | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 07:17:37 PM · #2 | 
		| | Don't forget to cover your wide end for landscapes. 
 
  | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 07:23:29 PM · #3 | 
		| | I used a 17-40 and a 100-400 in Africa, mostly the 100-400.  Instead of the 17-40, my 28-135 would have been a better choice for the wide end. 
 300 to 400 is the bare minimum when shooting the animals.  But, as Eugene mentioned, don't forget a wide angle lens for the amazing landscapes.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 07:28:04 PM · #4 | 
		| | This Sigma would be awesome for a safari, but might cost more than the whole trip. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 07:32:13 PM · #5 | 
		| | the Sigma 50-500 would server you well and is only $1,000 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 07:32:27 PM · #6 | 
		| | With a FF this lens may be better. 
 This wld be the bare minimum for wildlife on a FF, while still somewhat affordable.
 
 Previous posters used cameras with a 1.6 crop. There is, of course, nothing to multiply with the 1D. 400mm is 400mm is 400mm.
 
 Message edited by author 2007-01-31 19:38:16.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 07:40:19 PM · #7 | 
		| | It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400 or Sigmas, but certainly check it out - it's a good way to incrase range and versitility of a lens at lower cost. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 07:48:29 PM · #8 | 
		| | | Originally posted by OdysseyF22: It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400...
 | 
 
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 08:15:55 PM · #9 | 
		| | | Originally posted by zeuszen: 
 | Originally posted by OdysseyF22: It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400...
 | 
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.
 | 
 While I'd agree with this for dast moving wildlife. I disagree that autofocus is necessary. There were time I should have shot manual and got the focus dead on faster. I missed a few shots due to slow AF.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 08:38:17 PM · #10 | 
		| | | Originally posted by _eug: 
 | Originally posted by zeuszen: 
 | Originally posted by OdysseyF22: It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400...
 | 
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.
 | 
 While I'd agree with this for dast moving wildlife. I disagree that autofocus is necessary. There were time I should have shot manual and got the focus dead on faster. I missed a few shots due to slow AF.
 | 
 
 With the Canon EF 100-400mm?
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 08:39:09 PM · #11 | 
		| | | Originally posted by zeuszen: 
 | Originally posted by _eug: 
 | Originally posted by zeuszen: 
 | Originally posted by OdysseyF22: It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400...
 | 
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.
 | 
 While I'd agree with this for dast moving wildlife. I disagree that autofocus is necessary. There were time I should have shot manual and got the focus dead on faster. I missed a few shots due to slow AF.
 | 
 
 With the Canon EF 100-400mm?
 | 
 
 Eugene shoots Nikon. ;oP
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 08:45:33 PM · #12 | 
		| | | Originally posted by cpanaioti: 
 | Originally posted by zeuszen: 
 | Originally posted by _eug: 
 | Originally posted by zeuszen: 
 | Originally posted by OdysseyF22: It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400...
 | 
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.
 | 
 While I'd agree with this for dast moving wildlife. I disagree that autofocus is necessary. There were time I should have shot manual and got the focus dead on faster. I missed a few shots due to slow AF.
 | 
 
 With the Canon EF 100-400mm?
 | 
 
 Eugene shoots Nikon. ;oP
 | 
 
 Well, ok. On second thought, if his subjects are cooperative and fairly stationary, he might have something of a chance. I'd find this lens near impossible to manually focus a moving subject. And I imagine that a moving subject is what we want to take pictures of, every now and then.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 08:47:48 PM · #13 | 
		| | | Originally posted by zeuszen: 
 | Originally posted by cpanaioti: 
 | Originally posted by zeuszen: 
 | Originally posted by _eug: 
 | Originally posted by zeuszen: 
 | Originally posted by OdysseyF22: It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400...
 | 
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.
 | 
 While I'd agree with this for dast moving wildlife. I disagree that autofocus is necessary. There were time I should have shot manual and got the focus dead on faster. I missed a few shots due to slow AF.
 | 
 
 With the Canon EF 100-400mm?
 | 
 
 Eugene shoots Nikon. ;oP
 | 
 
 Well, ok. On second thought, if his subjects are cooperative and fairly stationary, he might have something of a chance. I'd find this lens near impossible to manually focus a moving subject. And I imagine that a moving subject is what we want to take pictures of, every now and then.
 | 
 
 You're right about trying to manually focus the 100-400 on a moving subject.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/31/2007 09:21:17 PM · #14 | 
		| | I say the 100-400 is minimal for wildlife and anything works for landscapes. I like my 24-70mm. If you can afford a 500 or 600mm or can rent one they would be great too. I would not use it with a TC too much loss of contrast and quality
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 03:51:05 PM EDT.