| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/04/2003 08:45:33 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Does that CS stand for yet another Color Space change?
It is a big pain when the "industry standard" ups and changes the standards ... I'm still happy enough with PS 5.x and have yet to come across a compelling enough reason to change ... |
My main reasons for upgrading are:
1.) 16-bit support
2.) RAW support (now includes the Camera RAW plugin)
3.) Greatly improved browser (it actually IS greatly improved!)
|
|
|
|
11/04/2003 10:27:09 PM · #27 |
I'm going to push my luck and see if I can't get my parents to buy me the Photoshop CS Premium package on Adobe via their educator's discount as a Christmas present.
Seems to be a nice bunch of programs packaged that are approx. $1300 at the regular price but only something like $400 for students/educators - assuming I read it right.
Gonna check it out further.
|
|
|
|
11/04/2003 10:57:04 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by LucidLotus:
I'm going to push my luck and see if I can't get my parents to buy me the Photoshop CS Premium package on Adobe via their educator's discount as a Christmas present.
Seems to be a nice bunch of programs packaged that are approx. $1300 at the regular price but only something like $400 for students/educators - assuming I read it right.
Gonna check it out further. |
Think I'm gonna try to get that deal too, seeing as I'm still a student.
|
|
|
|
11/05/2003 01:36:43 AM · #29 |
The new Photoshop CS has a lot of things that PhotoElements 2 had. The photomerge being one of them. However, I was not crazy about photomerge in Elements and I hope it is better in CS.
I'm waiting for my copy now. |
|
|
|
11/05/2003 01:54:40 AM · #30 |
Originally posted by kirbic:
My main reasons for upgrading are:
1.) 16-bit support
2.) RAW support (now includes the Camera RAW plugin)
3.) Greatly improved browser (it actually IS greatly improved!) |
1.) Haven't used it (yet). My scanner at work does support 16-bit, but nobody's asked me to do any scans that way.
2.) My camera doesn't support the RAW format. I also think it's a stupid name since Photoshop HAS supported a "format" called Raw since at least version 2.0 -- try opening a big ol' Excel spreadsheet with that sometime ...
3.) All those &$(^ image browsers and other "conveniences" usually leave me more confused than before. Although the one I got with the Fuji camera does print up a nice contact/proof sheet from a folder, so I can "browse" through a notebook of images somewheres far from my monitor.
Still, overall, I think I'm more lazy than Luddite ....
Message edited by author 2003-11-05 01:56:43. |
|
|
|
11/05/2003 02:43:48 AM · #31 |
Originally posted by JC Homola:
Right, we know that, and that is the point. Those w/ expensive cameras can hold long shutters. Those with out cannot. By being able to combine to images you can create the same effect.
|
There are some somewhat afforable cams that will do long exposures, up to 15s. Canon and Samsung make some average priced ones to do it |
|
|
|
11/05/2003 02:45:03 AM · #32 |
| so who wants to share their version of CS?.. so I can stop using 5.5, and I can stop using this Canon program to convert RAW images (It's not a very smart program) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/29/2025 06:31:15 AM EDT.
