| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/01/2007 08:40:36 PM · #26 |
| I hope they don't decide against doing one, the only reason I renewed my membership was so that I can submit to it... |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 07:06:40 AM · #27 |
Me too. I have held one back all year, waiting for the best of 2006. Oh well, I guess it is true that the frequency of entries has tempered it. I mean we could have been talking over 1000 entries, maybe even 2000.Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Sheesh, not in my case; I've been holding one in reserve practically forever...
R. |
Message edited by author 2007-01-02 07:07:58. |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 08:21:34 AM · #28 |
| Maybe they have something else planned. Like Best of 2006 by CATEGORY. Wouldn't that be more fair? Then you could only enter one of them, and the voting would definitely be easier. How can you put a portrait up against a landscape? Just a suggestion. I know last year this was discussed about breaking it up into categories. Maybe they listened. |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 08:46:25 AM · #29 |
Originally posted by JunieMoon:
Maybe they have something else planned. Like Best of 2006 by CATEGORY. Wouldn't that be more fair? Then you could only enter one of them, and the voting would definitely be easier. How can you put a portrait up against a landscape? Just a suggestion. I know last year this was discussed about breaking it up into categories. Maybe they listened. |
I like this idea :)
It should be enforced!
edit:
Of course, that would mean I will have to become a member, but then itll be worth it.
Message edited by author 2007-01-02 08:47:38. |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 08:49:25 AM · #30 |
| I would LOVE a 2006 by category! |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 08:52:08 AM · #31 |
PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Boy would it suck if i grovelled for this challenge, submitted and got nailed....:(
Message edited by Konador - Just fixing the page layout by adding spaces. |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 08:54:28 AM · #32 |
I´ve put off my holiday for a week just to be able to enter the best of 2006 challenge..... Leaving on the 7th, hope it is up by then.
|
|
|
|
01/02/2007 10:49:42 AM · #33 |
| Man, i want to post a best of 2006! What is the verdict here? Yea or Nay!?!?!?! |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 10:57:34 AM · #34 |
there will be the best of 2006 but next month, let people "choose wisely" ... mistake can be expensive ... and stuff :-)
|
|
|
|
01/02/2007 10:59:25 AM · #35 |
I have had one in mind since late spring. Hoping they do one, but it wouldn't hurt my feelings if they waited a week or two. I'm still cleaning up from the holidays. LOL
Happy New Year everyone. |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 11:46:57 AM · #36 |
| If it makes you feel any better, I, too, had a shot that didn't fit any challenges and was before the monthly free studies, and I was saving for best of 2006, if there was one. :) :/ |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 02:53:27 PM · #37 |
| Just because there's no Best of 2006 posted doesn't mean there won't be one! ;-) |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:03:40 PM · #38 |
| It would mix it up a bit if it were announced under a different set of rules, too ;) |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:07:36 PM · #39 |
Best of 2006 - straight off the camera? ;0 -yes that's my suggestion if they're taking 'em!
Message edited by author 2007-01-02 15:09:42. |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:07:54 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by mist:
It would mix it up a bit if it were announced under a different set of rules, too ;) |
Awww man, don't even go there! I've already processed mine and sized it to 720...ready to submit. Let's do it. :D |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:20:00 PM · #41 |
| It should be a maximum of 700 pixels just to mess with Barry. ;-P |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:21:03 PM · #42 |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:21:49 PM · #43 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
It should be a maximum of 700 pixels just to mess with Barry. ;-P |
... and 175kb : ) |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:26:44 PM · #44 |
| Could those last 3 posts be considered a gang tackle?! Go ahead, stir the pot... :D |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:28:24 PM · #45 |
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Could those last 3 posts be considered a gang tackle?! Go ahead, stir the pot... :D |
It's so dangerous out here that we only travel in packs ... : ) |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:35:08 PM · #46 |
If a "Best of 2006" challenge is announced how would it be looked upon to enter a picture that had already been posted in your portfolio (or one very similar)...? Or would it simply be against the rules?
The reason for asking is of course, that I joined the site late 2006 and as I wanted something in my portfolio I posted pictures from earlier this year - and among them I see possible candidates for a "Best of..."
|
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:36:33 PM · #47 |
Originally posted by silverscreen:
If a "Best of 2006" challenge is announced how would it be looked upon to enter a picture that had already been posted in your portfolio (or one very similar)...? Or would it simply be against the rules?
The reason for asking is of course, that I joined the site late 2006 and as I wanted something in my portfolio I posted pictures from earlier this year - and among them I see possible candidates for a "Best of..." |
Not against the rules, and if you go hide them REAL quick, no one may ever know! :D |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:39:27 PM · #48 |
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Not against the rules, and if you go hide them REAL quick, no one may ever know! :D |
You needn't delete it if your don't want to -- just move it you your Workshop folder, though you'll have to re-upload a new version as an entry anyway. Might be interesting to compare later if you change the PP at all. |
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:40:12 PM · #49 |
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Not against the rules, and if you go hide them REAL quick, no one may ever know! :D |
Already did - before my previous post ;)
|
|
|
|
01/02/2007 03:44:19 PM · #50 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
... Might be interesting to compare later if you change the PP at all. |
Of course he needs to change the PP. Have to meet the challenge requirement of 700 pixels, wait...719 - of course those would just be maximums (I think - it's getting quite confusing). Then there's the whole file size requirment that's currently a moving target as well! :D |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/03/2025 06:21:48 PM EDT.
