Ignore - DPChallenge Forums

Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM

12/23/2006 08:13:29 PM · #29

Originally posted by Strikeslip:

Here's the original photo:

Actually, this is the one she submitted for validation...

Looks like she used a sign she made for a recent Clay Aiken concert and tried covering it up with doodles.

It also appears we're arguing Ursula's case for the ignore feature quite effectively.

Skip

Canon EOS-1D X

12/23/2006 08:22:42 PM · #30

i seem to remember mavrik requesting this feature shortly before he altogether quit the site...

;-)

edit: haha, ya can't reference dead accounts...

Message edited by author 2006-12-23 20:24:00.

12/23/2006 08:28:52 PM · #31

Originally posted by skiprow:

edit: haha, ya can't reference dead accounts...

Yeah, in the case of dead accounts, I think that the "user link feature" should default to the former user's website or direct email address. I mean, if current members don't get an ignore feature, why should past members??

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM

12/23/2006 08:30:26 PM · #32

Originally posted by skiprow:

i seem to remember mavrik requesting this feature shortly before he altogether quit the site...

;-)

edit: haha, ya can't reference dead accounts...

Yup.

I'd be interested in this but I still don't see how it would work well - especially considering that I'd most like to ignore the people who post a million times and in every single thread. Seems like it would mess up every thread. I'd also be in favor of limiting the number of threads people could create in a given period of time. I personally think 4 and 5 a week is a bit excessive.

karmat

Apple iPhone 7

12/23/2006 08:34:22 PM · #33

Admittedly, there are days when I would really, really, really, really, really like this feature.

If actually implemented, I think the number of users you could actually ignore should be limited.

For each year you are a paid member, you could ignore 2 more people.

David Ey

Nikon D80

Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f2.8D

12/23/2006 08:39:41 PM · #34

Originally posted by ursula:

Ah, good, I like PMs.

Don't you mean PMS ?

fotomann_forever

12/23/2006 08:43:53 PM · #35

Originally posted by BeeCee:

...not to mention desperate ... ;)

I prefer to call it reluctantly single...

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

12/23/2006 08:44:53 PM · #36

Originally posted by mk:

I personally think 4 and 5 a week is a bit excessive.

mk => thread nazi ;-)

*dodges smiting*

Photologist

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

12/23/2006 08:45:33 PM · #37

Originally posted by karmat:

Hey Langdon, fiscally, wouldn't it make sense to have a surcharge say, $25 (or maybe $15) per year, per squelched person?

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM

12/23/2006 08:46:35 PM · #38

Originally posted by lesgainous:

Originally posted by karmat:
Admittedly, there are days when I would really, really, really, really, really like this feature.

If actually implemented, I think the number of users you could actually ignore should be limited.

For each year you are a paid member, you could ignore 2 more people.

Hey Langdon, fiscally, wouldn't it make sense to have a surcharge say, $25 (or maybe $15) per year, per squelched person?

If that happens, some of us would want a commission. :)

fotomann_forever

12/23/2006 08:52:18 PM · #39

Originally posted by Art Roflmao:

Originally posted by lesgainous:

Originally posted by karmat:
Admittedly, there are days when I would really, really, really, really, really like this feature.

If actually implemented, I think the number of users you could actually ignore should be limited.

For each year you are a paid member, you could ignore 2 more people.

Hey Langdon, fiscally, wouldn't it make sense to have a surcharge say, $25 (or maybe $15) per year, per squelched person?

If that happens, some of us would want a commission. :)

Amen brotha, amen!

Judi

Canon EOS-5D Mark III

12/23/2006 08:55:48 PM · #40

Originally posted by Art Roflmao:

If that happens, some of us would want a commission. :)

Oh yaaaaa.......I think we could then retire very happily...lmao!!

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM

12/23/2006 08:57:45 PM · #41

Originally posted by Art Roflmao:

Originally posted by mk:
I personally think 4 and 5 a week is a bit excessive.

mk => thread nazi ;-)

*dodges smiting*

I'm going to go start a thread detailing my feelings on this. :/

Dear D~~iary~~PC...

karmat

Apple iPhone 7

12/23/2006 09:00:58 PM · #42

way to go guys, now mk is going to get all introspective. this can't be good. . .

Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D

12/23/2006 09:21:54 PM · #43

It's time she got in touch with her inner child. Deep down, we all know there's a ~~scared~~ scary little girl in there. :)

edit typo

Message edited by author 2006-12-23 21:22:02.

_eug

Nikon D50

12/23/2006 09:44:43 PM · #44

Originally posted by karmat:

way to go guys, now mk is going to get all introspective. this can't be good. . .

Hopefully she's not gone as long as last time. I can't go without mk for 6 months again.

Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D

12/23/2006 09:49:09 PM · #45

eug => codependent ;-)

_eug

Nikon D50

12/24/2006 01:26:52 AM · #46

Originally posted by Art Roflmao:

eug => codependent ;-)

Art => Right. (Don't quote me on that. I'll deny it everytime.)

Fujifilm XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS

12/24/2006 01:30:07 AM · #47

6 months?! I was gone for like two days.

ursula

Fujifilm X-T2

12/24/2006 01:34:06 AM · #48

Originally posted by mk:

6 months?! I was gone for like two days.

mk!!!! You're back!!!! Where have you been?