| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/14/2006 12:45:20 AM · #1 |
| is genuine fractals good? and is there any other programs that are better that i should consider? |
|
|
|
12/14/2006 12:49:15 AM · #2 |
I have been told that PS CS2 using bucibic sharper/smoother (for shrinking/enlarging images respectively) does at least as good a job as GF and is much faster. Some even say that PS is better.
|
|
|
|
12/14/2006 12:50:47 AM · #3 |
Fred Miranda has some that many serious photographers ay are better than GF, and they go for a fraction of the price. I have his "Resize Pro" and the earlier "SI Pro".
//www.fredmiranda.com
I have heard several users of CS2 opine that these programs aren't necessary any longer, that Photoshop does a fine job of upsizing now, but I'm still using PS7 so I can't answer tot hat.
R.
|
|
|
|
12/14/2006 12:51:24 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by joezl:
I have been told that PS CS2 using bucibic sharper/smoother (for shrinking/enlarging images respectively) does at least as good a job as GF and is much faster. Some even say that PS is better. |
And before those were available simple stair interpolation using bicubic in PS was said to be as good as Genuine Fractals. |
|
|
|
12/14/2006 01:01:31 AM · #5 |
I have Fred Miranda SI Pro and I think it hands down beats bicubic smoother.
|
|
|
|
12/14/2006 01:13:27 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
+snip+ so I can't answer tot hat.
R. |
Hmm, new expression to me. I'll have to remember that one. ;-)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/21/2025 12:39:28 PM EDT.
