| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/03/2006 05:09:36 AM · #1 |
So seeing the ridiculous amount of cool pictures people take with wide angle lenses has made me super jealous and I've decided that the time to purchase a wide angle is nowwww! Currently I have the classic Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II and the Tamron SP AF 24-135mm f/3.5-5.6 AD Aspherical IF. I was thinking something around the 10-20mm range.
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM looks really good, but am I correct in thinking that when I purchase a new camera in a few years this lens won't fit? Maybe not the best decision then.
Well, the equivalent lens seems like the Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM. Would this be my best option?
Here are the DPC links to both:
//www.dpchallenge.com/lens.php?LENS_ID=6
//www.dpchallenge.com/lens.php?LENS_ID=1193
Editted to correct the second link
Thanks!
-Davy
Message edited by author 2006-12-03 23:09:53. |
|
|
|
12/03/2006 05:34:32 AM · #2 |
| The 10-22 EF-S will only "not fit" if you go for a full frame sensor camera when you upgrade. Chances are this would mean the 5D or 1dsMKII or their successors. With any other EOS you'd be fine. |
|
|
|
12/03/2006 06:44:30 AM · #3 |
I think you're missing a more popular 10-20 lens. It's a Sigma but has some extra letters in its title. Here's a linky:
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM for Canon
You'll see one of my recent shots in fifth spot for the lens. My shot only has a little bit cropped off on the right side, so it's a pretty decent example of the cool distortion you get at the 10mm end of the lens. Keep your F-stop at 8 or higher and the focus is pretty good across the entire field of view.
I have no idea about what it fits or not, except that it fits my camera. I sort of walked into Henry's one day to look around and somehow ended up walking out with this lens. ;-)
|
|
|
|
12/03/2006 06:47:07 AM · #4 |
Hmmm, now that I look at it, I think maybe DPC made a typo on your second lens link?
|
|
|
|
12/03/2006 10:52:00 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip: Hmmm, now that I look at it, I think maybe DPC made a typo on your second lens link? |
That link Slippy? That lens is for a Sigma, not a Canon. I'm guessing Nerdy just posted the wrong one...
|
|
|
|
12/03/2006 01:01:38 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by mist: The 10-22 EF-S will only "not fit" if you go for a full frame sensor camera when you upgrade. Chances are this would mean the 5D or 1dsMKII or their successors. With any other EOS you'd be fine. |
They also wont work with any 1.3x crop factor camera such as the 1d, 1DMKII, 1DMKIIn, just point out that its not just FF cameras that it wont fit.
MattO
|
|
|
|
12/03/2006 01:59:51 PM · #7 |
You might want to check if the sigma will also fit. It was my understanding that they were following the EF-S mount, not the EF, which fits all EOS models.
The Sigma DG mimic EF, the DC mimic EF-S. Again, you'd want to double check that.
|
|
|
|
12/03/2006 02:38:32 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by shanelighter: You might want to check if the sigma will also fit. It was my understanding that they were following the EF-S mount, not the EF, which fits all EOS models.
The Sigma DG mimic EF, the DC mimic EF-S. Again, you'd want to double check that. |
The Sigma lenses all use the EF mount, that means they will mount on any EOS camera. The problem is that the lenses designed for the APS-C sensor have a smaller image circle and will produce vignetting with larger sensors, though usually only at the short end of the zoom range.
If you want a lens wider than 14mm that will cover full frame, currently, the Sigma 12-24 is the only one I know of that will provide such coverage without resorting to a fisheye. |
|
|
|
12/03/2006 03:36:31 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by NerdJNerdBird:
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM looks really good, but am I correct in thinking that when I purchase a new camera in a few years this lens won't fit? Maybe not the best decision then.
|
I think the Canon 10-22 is an awesome lens...one of the lenses I use the most. You are not planning on buying a new camera for a few years so if you get this lens now, you will have gotten tons and tons of use out of it. I don't think it is a waste to buy it. You will get your money's worth. And you will LOVE IT!
When you get a FF camera, then I'd get the Canon 17-40.
It is just really hard to beat the Canon 10-22. I'll probably never buy 3rd party lenses ever again.
Message edited by author 2006-12-03 15:37:23. |
|
|
|
12/03/2006 03:56:25 PM · #10 |
nobody mentioned the Tokina 12-24 f4 before...
i ordered it last week, so i can't tell you about my personal experiences, because it's still on its way.
but i know, it has a better resolution and contrast then the sigma 12-24/10-20 and a similar one as the canon 10-20.
take a look here (it's a german page, but the pictures should tell you enough...):
//www.nikon-foto.de/templates/stuff/test/tokina_sigma_12-24.html |
|
|
|
12/03/2006 11:20:15 PM · #11 |
sorry about posting the wrong link! fixed that
is the Canon worth the extra money for a poor college student like myself?
Thanks for the responses everyone! |
|
|
|
12/03/2006 11:38:21 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by NerdJNerdBird: sorry about posting the wrong link! fixed that
is the Canon worth the extra money for a poor college student like myself?
Thanks for the responses everyone! |
YES! |
|
|
|
12/04/2006 01:15:13 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by NerdJNerdBird: sorry about posting the wrong link! fixed that
is the Canon worth the extra money for a poor college student like myself?
Thanks for the responses everyone! |
Of course, you can eat ramen noodles and spend your financial aid money on lenses. |
|
|
|
12/04/2006 06:23:57 AM · #14 |
Searching around some more I found some lens reviews. Just looking at the sharpness in them it seems like Sigma is easily comparable to the Canon lens. I don't know much about what these numbers mean specifically or anything though.
Canon: //photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/canon_1022_3545/index.htm
Sigma: //photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/sigma_1020_456/index.htm
Does this mean that the Sigma is comparable?
|
|
|
|
12/04/2006 10:28:39 AM · #15 |
From what i have read they are both excellent lenses.
I will be buying the sigma 10-20 in the next few days :)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/08/2026 06:19:15 AM EST.