DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Individual Photograph Discussion >> Business Card Help
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 19 of 19, (reverse)
AuthorThread
11/18/2006 08:21:56 PM · #1
Help, I need to choose a logo for a design and machining "company" i want to start.

I have two logos to choose from, but i don't know which.

I put them into a mock up business card just to put them into perspective.

Should I go for the 2D or the 3D version?

Please let me know,
Aleks.

11/20/2006 11:35:58 AM · #2
I prefer the 3d version (the bottom one)
11/20/2006 11:38:09 AM · #3
2D, 3d looks cheesy too me :O
11/20/2006 11:42:36 AM · #4
I'd say it depends on your intended audience. The 3d looks more stylish while the 2d looks more industrial and utilitarian. It also could be a quention of quality vs. quantity. The 3d style is more tailored to a higher end customer IMO.
If I had to pick, I'd probably go 2-d but the thin horizontal line in the NAME of the company is too thin in contrast to the logo I think.

Message edited by author 2006-11-20 11:44:23.
11/20/2006 12:25:43 PM · #5
3D here too.
11/20/2006 03:25:24 PM · #6
2D allot nice IMO

it looks alot more clean cut and "professional" than the 3d one. i think the 3D reminds me of cheesy logos that are overly used
11/20/2006 03:50:04 PM · #7
that's a tough one. i think i'd go with the 2d one-i like the coloring better
11/20/2006 05:09:32 PM · #8
Have you considered doing a double sided card. They are so cheap these days and you'll have a less cluttered look.

Place your logo, what you do, your name and title (President/Ceo) on the front and all the contact info on the flip side.



Just some quick ideas and possible options.

Message edited by author 2006-11-20 18:14:36.
11/20/2006 05:56:14 PM · #9
i like the 2d better - and might have the line under the company NAME attach to the tip of the L in the logo
11/20/2006 07:15:31 PM · #10
My preference is the 2D version, however, I agree the separating line should be thicker, about the thickness of the narrow section in the logo font.

I disagree about the upscale comments earlier. The 2D has a more graphic design feel and less the feel of a lesser budget software font.

Becky
11/20/2006 07:27:57 PM · #11
i'd actually opt to have more info on one side of the card and make the logo/heading fit nicely into a corner. the 3d effect likely wouldn't work for this. i would stick with a one sided card - maybe make the back side slick print black and the front textured ink...

put opposites together in a symbiotic sense.

Message edited by author 2006-11-20 19:28:25.
11/20/2006 07:33:19 PM · #12
3d
11/20/2006 07:34:19 PM · #13
Well, considering that it's a machining company, I like the 3D better. It shows in a subtle way the precision with which the parts of the logo are fitted together. . . . or maybe I'm reading way too much into it. :)
11/20/2006 07:44:06 PM · #14
Sorry, but I have to go against the grain with others because the 3-D SCREAMS cheesy. The 2-D looks better IMO.
11/20/2006 09:25:06 PM · #15
Originally posted by pawdrix:

Have you considered doing a double sided card. They are so cheap these days and you'll have a less cluttered look.

Place your logo, what you do, your name and title (President/Ceo) on the front and all the contact info on the flip side.



Just some quick ideas and possible options.


I like that idea... thanks pawdrix
11/20/2006 11:17:44 PM · #16
2D is good and bold. Sturdy looking. - the half-tones of the 3D version will be hard to deal with in many printing applications.
11/21/2006 11:50:28 PM · #17
So I guess the 2D has the lead...

Any objections?
11/21/2006 11:53:14 PM · #18
I Object!!!
11/21/2006 11:59:58 PM · #19
I'd say, flip a coin. Both look good as long as you take my sage advice on the two sided thang...

I always associate engineering with complexity, so I'd go with the most complex looking of the two.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 05:22:31 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 05:22:31 PM EDT.