| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/13/2006 01:59:39 PM · #1 |
Open to critiques and compliments.
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 02:10:27 PM · #2 |
Heya fellow KC dude.
I think you might need to calibrate your monitor. What I'm seeing doesn't even show the signature until I brighten it.
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 02:13:20 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by wavelength:
Heya fellow KC dude.
I think you might need to calibrate your monitor. What I'm seeing doesn't even show the signature until I brighten it. |
doh. see I'm at work and last night it looked perfect at home. then when i got to work, it looked like crap. i guess my monitor at home was correct.
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 02:14:51 PM · #4 |
|
|
|
11/13/2006 02:15:03 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by rpwsrw:
Originally posted by wavelength:
Heya fellow KC dude.
I think you might need to calibrate your monitor. What I'm seeing doesn't even show the signature until I brighten it. |
doh. see I'm at work and last night it looked perfect at home. then when i got to work, it looked like crap. i guess my monitor at home was correct. |
Yeah, I try not to even vote from work anymore. I used to have good monitors there, then they replaced them with LCD suckage.
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 02:28:31 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by chispa:
this is WAY too dark... |
i know, i know. I goofed re-editing it here at work. i had it right the first time at home. I would delete the thread if I could.
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 02:31:31 PM · #7 |
|
|
|
11/13/2006 02:32:26 PM · #8 |
| Odd. I see the signature and I just double-checked to make sure I can see every single gradient square on the bar beneath the challenge images and I can... |
|
|
|
11/13/2006 02:46:59 PM · #9 |
Okay, so how does this look to everyone?
too bright, too dark? Maybe it's me...
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 02:50:59 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by wavelength:
Okay, so how does this look to everyone?
too bright, too dark? Maybe it's me...
|
That looks very nice to me. A nice improvement.
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 02:53:06 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by timfythetoo:
That looks very nice to me. A nice improvement. |
Okay, you had me worried there for a moment. :/
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 03:33:04 PM · #12 |
I'll have to jack with it when I get home tonight. Your version looks good, except there is something off on the color of her lips now. They're not that red. But then again, apparently my monitor here is crap.
Message edited by author 2006-11-13 15:33:18.
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 03:56:28 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by wavelength:
Originally posted by timfythetoo:
That looks very nice to me. A nice improvement. |
Okay, you had me worried there for a moment. :/ |
I think that the blacker dark areas work well and really bring out the highlights nice. My monitor shows it very clean
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 04:02:10 PM · #14 |
i don't like the new version of it. i like the subtleness of the light and I wouldn't bump up the light much. a little increase would be nice but not that extreme.
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 04:08:37 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by achiral:
i don't like the new version of it. i like the subtleness of the light and I wouldn't bump up the light much. a little increase would be nice but not that extreme. |
I didn't really mess with the light all that much, I set the black point on the background, lightened her face a bit, and used a diffuse glow on her to smooth her skin (that's where the highlight came from). A little finer level of PP would fix it. This was just a quick cleanup. :/
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 04:10:27 PM · #16 |
The image is not WAY too dark... just a bit of a bump up in the midtone levels and you're set.
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 10:14:26 PM · #17 |
i started over. how about now?
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 10:47:05 PM · #18 |
here's the B/W
|
|
|
|
11/13/2006 10:50:36 PM · #19 |
| Looks better in color. Would like to see it with more negative space on th left. Nice shot. |
|
|
|
11/13/2006 11:28:57 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by rpwsrw:
i started over. how about now? |
Looks better and I prefer the color version
|
|
