| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/03/2006 09:15:51 AM · #176 |
Votes: 146
Views: 235
Avg Vote: 6.1781
Comments: 11
not moving much, but hanging in there.
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 09:28:45 AM · #177 |
Votes: 139
Views: 176
Avg Vote: 4.6259
And no comments for me either - which sucks since this is the first time I've entered a challenge and would really like to have input on my photo! Not too disappointed with the score though, although I think it's an awesome shot! |
|
|
|
11/03/2006 09:29:39 AM · #178 |
| I don't have the full membership yet - can people still post comments on my entries? |
|
|
|
11/03/2006 09:37:42 AM · #179 |
Originally posted by ivale28:
I don't have the full membership yet - can people still post comments on my entries? |
Yes
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 09:40:23 AM · #180 |
I knew this would be a Love or Hate type of shot......can you guess which one by the score?
Votes: 147
Views: 240
Avg Vote: 4.7959
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 09:57:12 AM · #181 |
Votes: 141
Views: 192
Avg Vote: 5.9291
Comments: 5
Favorites: 0
Come on 6 :-)
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 10:21:19 AM · #182 |
|
|
|
11/03/2006 10:22:59 AM · #183 |
Originally posted by kudzu:
Originally posted by kudzu:
Originally posted by kudzu:
Votes: 1
Avg Vote: 5.0000 |
Votes: 25
Avg Vote: 4.1600 |
Votes: 100
Avg Vote: 4.6900
Comments: 2 |
Votes: 145
Views: 193
Avg Vote: 4.7103
Comments: 2
guess i should be happy that this will no longer be the lowest score in my profile... ;)
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 10:57:19 AM · #184 |
Yippeee! Up a little bit from yesterday.
Votes: 141
Views: 208
Avg Vote: 6.6241
Comments: 13
Favorites: 1
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 11:05:58 AM · #185 |
Votes: 157
Views: 226
Avg Vote: 6.3694
Comments: 4
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 11:37:04 AM · #186 |
it went down a bit from last time :[
Votes: 144
Views: 353
Avg Vote: 6.5208
Comments: 16
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 11/03/06 11:10 am
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 12:20:15 PM · #187 |
Votes: 140
Views: 183
Avg Vote: 5.0071
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Up above 5...whoooohoooo.
Don't forget NOT to comment on mine.
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 12:22:22 PM · #188 |
Comments: 0
Still with ya buddy! |
|
|
|
11/03/2006 01:56:22 PM · #189 |
To everyone who has entered an entry in the Portrait in Landscape challenge, I just want to say Thank You! It was truly a pleasure to vote on that group and overall, it was a very good group of shots. One of the most fun I've gotten to vote on as of late.
Keep up the good work Peeps!
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 01:57:49 PM · #190 |
Originally posted by cryingdragon:
Votes: 140
Views: 183
Avg Vote: 5.0071
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Up above 5...whoooohoooo.
Don't forget NOT to comment on mine. |
Hey, so maybe if I ask those who commented on mine to delete their comments, my score could break the 5 mark too. I need all the help I can get, lol.
;-)
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 04:12:06 PM · #191 |
Votes: 144
Views: 193
Avg Vote: 5.1389
Comments: 6
First time above 5.... can I stay there?!!!!!!
:) |
|
|
|
11/03/2006 04:36:03 PM · #192 |
Am oing better every ay after being around 5.1XXX for a whole day and a half...climbing...hope to get to 6.XXXX
Votes: 155
Views: 212
Avg Vote: 5.9355
Comments: 5
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 11/03/06 04:29 pm
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 05:25:58 PM · #193 |
I'm sorry... but I don't see how I can get this -
Challenge Met - 2
Mine is a portrait, in landscape format! How does it not meet the challenge?????
If someone took a portrait, in landscape mode... they got a 5 off the bat from me. To me... it met the challenge! The rest of the score depended on the technical, the artistic aspect and so on.
I just don't get it!!!!!
*grumble*
Message edited by author 2006-11-03 17:27:02. |
|
|
|
11/03/2006 06:19:20 PM · #194 |
Originally posted by nsoroma79:
I'm sorry... but I don't see how I can get this -
Challenge Met - 2
Mine is a portrait, in landscape format! How does it not meet the challenge?????
If someone took a portrait, in landscape mode... they got a 5 off the bat from me. To me... it met the challenge! The rest of the score depended on the technical, the artistic aspect and so on.
I just don't get it!!!!!
*grumble* |
I think I got one from the same poster except I got a 0 for Challenge met. Mine is a portrait and undoubted landscape.
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 06:36:47 PM · #195 |
Originally posted by scarbrd:
Originally posted by nsoroma79:
I'm sorry... but I don't see how I can get this -
Challenge Met - 2
Mine is a portrait, in landscape format! How does it not meet the challenge?????
If someone took a portrait, in landscape mode... they got a 5 off the bat from me. To me... it met the challenge! The rest of the score depended on the technical, the artistic aspect and so on.
I just don't get it!!!!!
*grumble* |
I think I got one from the same poster except I got a 0 for Challenge met. Mine is a portrait and undoubted landscape. |
I hope that person doesn't comment on mine. I'd hate to have my perfect rate of no comments ruined.
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 06:58:29 PM · #196 |
Status: Your submission has been disqualified:
Cloning, dodging, burning, etc. to improve your photo or remove imperfections or minor distracting elements, etc. is acceptable. However, using any editing tools to duplicate, create, or move major elements of your photograph is not permitted.
This is an interesting ruling since nothing in the photo was duplicated created or moved, let alone a major element. I've sent an inquiry to the SC and am hopeful of a response. In the mean time, I'd also appreciate it if, after the challenge, any of you could look at the shot and let me know if you see where they are coming from. All the editing steps are listed in the about section. I'm already aware that the image itself was not being well received and am not as interested in critique on the shot itself. I'm more interested in whether anyone sees a problem with the editing steps for an advanced editing challenge image. Thanks.
Message edited by author 2006-11-03 19:00:13. |
|
|
|
11/03/2006 07:01:00 PM · #197 |
Originally posted by EricMGB1974:
Status: Your submission has been disqualified:
Cloning, dodging, burning, etc. to improve your photo or remove imperfections or minor distracting elements, etc. is acceptable. However, using any editing tools to duplicate, create, or move major elements of your photograph is not permitted.
This is an interesting ruling since nothing in the photo was duplicated created or moved, let alone a major element. I've sent an inquiry to the SC and am hopeful of a response. In the mean time, I'd also appreciate it if, after the challenge, any of you could look at the shot and let me know if you see where they are coming from. All the editing steps are listed in the about section. I'm already aware that the image itself was not being well recieved. I'm more interested in whether anyone sees a problem with the editing steps for an advanced editing challenge image. Thanks. |
If you have a ticket in with the SC to possibly get it reinstated, I don't think it's a good idea to have anyone look at it. However, if the ticket isn't about that, I'd be more than happy to look.
Message edited by author 2006-11-03 19:02:28.
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 07:32:23 PM · #198 |
Thanks for the offer, but it can wait until after the challenge if anyone remembers or wants to help.
I don't know if they would reinstate an image or not, and to be honest, with how poorly it was doing, it really doesn't break my heart to see a DQ. I just have no idea what I was DQ'ed for and would like to avoid it in the future. |
|
|
|
11/03/2006 07:48:36 PM · #199 |
Noooooooooooooooooooooooo.....I got a comment :(
Well, it was after 156 votes.
Message edited by author 2006-11-03 19:50:10.
|
|
|
|
11/03/2006 07:55:23 PM · #200 |
Bummer dude ...
Comments: 0 |
|
