Author | Thread |
|
10/24/2006 04:02:57 PM · #51 |
|
|
10/24/2006 04:13:28 PM · #52 |
He, he, bokeh is like those things when you say, "I don't know how to explain it, but I know it when I see it." |
|
|
10/24/2006 04:27:58 PM · #53 |
Cool thing is that bokeh can be anything you imagine that it is. It is the universal symbol for all things blurry. lol
Message edited by author 2006-10-24 16:28:08. |
|
|
10/24/2006 04:28:51 PM · #54 |
I should have taken a picture of a customer today but feared a dnmc.
He came in and said "I bokeh my car" - can you fix it today? |
|
|
10/24/2006 04:44:16 PM · #55 |
Originally posted by BradP: He came in and said "I bokeh my car" - can you fix it today? |
Tell him, "No, I need to focus today." ;-D |
|
|
10/24/2006 04:45:20 PM · #56 |
Originally posted by BradP: "I bokeh my car" - can you fix it today? |
ha ha - you are too much, Brad. Did you fix it with blurred speed?
|
|
|
10/24/2006 04:45:48 PM · #57 |
BradP works on Fords? Shame on him. |
|
|
10/24/2006 04:49:36 PM · #58 |
Originally posted by lesgainous:
Unfortunately, the rules for Bokeh III specifically state a photograph with a subject. I see no subject in your example. |
Of course there's a subject. It might not meet the weird definition for the current challenge, but there is certainly a subject in that photo.
Message edited by author 2006-10-24 16:50:25. |
|
|
10/24/2006 04:51:34 PM · #59 |
Originally posted by Jutilda: Originally posted by BradP: "I bokeh my car" - can you fix it today? |
ha ha - you are too much, Brad. Did you fix it with blurred speed? |
BFH |
|
|
10/24/2006 04:53:33 PM · #60 |
Originally posted by ursula: BradP works on Fords? Shame on him. |
I really try not to.
(insert subliminal message) ---> POS
Have 2 Lexus LS400's in today - what a shame... |
|
|
10/24/2006 04:57:35 PM · #61 |
Originally posted by Gordon: Originally posted by lesgainous:
Unfortunately, the rules for Bokeh III specifically state a photograph with a subject. I see no subject in your example. |
Of course there's a subject. It might not meet the weird definition for the current challenge, but there is certainly a subject in that photo. |
Yes!!!! I like that. Who in the world decided that a "subject" has to be just this one thing - something "in focus"?
Not that I want to start another fight here :) |
|
|
10/24/2006 05:00:02 PM · #62 |
Originally posted by BradP: Originally posted by ursula: BradP works on Fords? Shame on him. |
I really try not to.
(insert subliminal message) ---> POS
Have 2 Lexus LS400's in today - what a shame... |
My neighbour would like you. He details cars, and only high-end cars. The cars he has over make my poor little red Subaru look like garbage :( But I've learned a fair bit about cleaning and detailing cars. More than I ever wanted to know I think. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/25/2025 02:52:54 PM EDT.