| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/25/2006 04:48:32 PM · #1 |
I can't seem to find a straight answer to this question:
I have a 105mm macro lens that gets 1:1 macro. If I use a 27.5 extension tube on this lens, will I get "better" than 1:1? I don't need exact numbers, just need to know how the tube will work on my 105.
Thanks,
KenSkid
|
|
|
|
09/25/2006 05:00:29 PM · #2 |
Yes, you will get a higher magnification (able to focus closer)but, you will lose dof (think low single figure mm's).
|
|
|
|
09/25/2006 05:06:54 PM · #3 |
yes
maybe
it depends -- from my PB-6 manual (bellows) extention starts at 48mm-208mm for 1:2-2:1 (1/2-2x) for a 105/f4 macro
and 1/6-1/1.1 for 105/f2.5 (133mm-208mm)
what you have to do is try it ;) |
|
|
|
09/25/2006 05:13:18 PM · #4 |
reproduction ratio= extention/focal length
(for lenses focused at infinity)
again from the bellows manual ..
|
|
|
|
09/25/2006 05:20:12 PM · #5 |
So....my 105mm macro will gain .26?
27.5/105= .261
So does this mean 1:1.261 in place of 1:1 ?
1/4 gain in mag is fine with me for this cheap tube...
Skid
Originally posted by ralph: reproduction ratio= extention/focal length
(for lenses focused at infinity)
again from the bellows manual .. |
|
|
|
|
09/25/2006 05:31:16 PM · #6 |
or, you could reverse a 50mm lens on your 105 and go EXTREME!

|
|
|
|
09/25/2006 05:46:01 PM · #7 |
Funny you should say that. Over the weekend I was experimenting with my old Canon 1.4 50mm lens "handheld" over the 105mm. Was too complicated "holding" the lens but managed to get a few shots. Here is one....what do you thing the mag is on something like that?
Skid
Edit: Do you have any other shots?
Originally posted by Ecce Signum: or, you could reverse a 50mm lens on your 105 and go EXTREME!
|
Message edited by author 2006-09-25 17:46:46.
|
|
|
|
09/25/2006 07:03:59 PM · #8 |
you peaked my curiousity
all at are min. focus (1:1 with no extention)
105mm ,00mm extention , side to side is 59/64th of an inch (1:1)
105mm ,20mm extention , side to side is 47/64th of an inch 1.26:1
105mm ,36mm extention , side to side is 40/64th of an inch 1.48:1
105mm ,68mm extention , side to side is 31/64th of an inch 1.9:1
i have not checked working distance but ir probably reduces at the same rate as the magnification
105mm + 68mm extention
Message edited by author 2006-09-25 19:05:15. |
|
|
|
09/25/2006 07:37:54 PM · #9 |
Hmmm so with the ebay extension I just purchased for $25 I'll get about 1.33 : 1 when used with my 105mm....
This will be about what I'm looking for...
Thanks,
Originally posted by ralph: you peaked my curiousity
all at are min. focus (1:1 with no extention)
105mm ,00mm extention , side to side is 59/64th of an inch (1:1)
105mm ,20mm extention , side to side is 47/64th of an inch 1.26:1
105mm ,36mm extention , side to side is 40/64th of an inch 1.48:1
105mm ,68mm extention , side to side is 31/64th of an inch 1.9:1
i have not checked working distance but ir probably reduces at the same rate as the magnification
105mm + 68mm extention |
|
|
|
|
09/25/2006 07:47:16 PM · #10 |
oh and for completion / here is a coulple more
60mm ,68mm extention , side to side is 24.5/64th of an inch 2.4:1
200mm ,68mm extention , side to side is 33/64th of an inch 1.8:1 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/08/2026 02:19:16 AM EST.