DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Photography Discussion >> Legal Photography.... HELP!!!
Pages:  
Showing posts 26 - 30 of 30, (reverse)
AuthorThread
08/30/2006 04:25:15 PM · #26
Thought I'd revive this thread to get it back on track.... The main purpose was to get input on the legal photography aspect, not to hash out the advantages/disadvantages of an LLC. My shoot is in 2 hours. Anyone?
08/30/2006 04:39:56 PM · #27
I don't know what the usual charges are for this service -- perhaps you could call the Bar Association and find out what the "usual and customary" charges are in your area. Or charge the same hourly rate as your lawyer ...

Treat it as any other forensic or documentary project -- show the details and context of what they want you to illustrate, probably two (or more) views of each. Set the WB for the lighting you have, since you won't want to edit these. Try to have two light sources, in case you need to eliminate shadows and glare.

It's often a good idea to include a common object -- quarter, pencil, ruler, etc -- to allow accurate measurements within the photo. Perhaps the ideal would be to make a small card with ruler tic marks, some color swatches, and a place to write the case number and date, and include that card in each shot. Make it business card sized and you can fit 3 on a 4x6 print -- you still have time if you have a 1-hour photo-processing shop nearby.

PS: Someplace I seem to remember something about taking two exposures of each shot, in case one file gets corrupt, and because it would be hard to retouch two photos exactly the same way, and so serves as a fraud-deterrent. If this is not a standard practice, it seems like a good idea ...

Also ... this is probably a "work for hire" -- the lawyer (or client) will probably own all rights to the photos. If you want to use any for promotional (or other) purposes you should get a release.

Message edited by author 2006-08-30 16:44:34.
08/30/2006 05:10:26 PM · #28
Thanks for the input... I'm getting together a "ruler" as we speak. I've been torn as to whether or not I could shoot RAW. I'm assuming it should be JPEG and straight from the camera?
08/30/2006 05:14:30 PM · #29
If you have enough memory you can probably shoot RAW + JPEG at the largest size -- but I'd ask the lawyer.
08/30/2006 07:02:00 PM · #30
Originally posted by Palmetto_Pixels:

Originally posted by L2:

Originally posted by Palmetto_Pixels:

... It's one of the rare times when you want your photograph to look as "bad" as possible.


What are the rules on editing such photographs? Or, are there any?


Very good question indeed. I would imagine that any "altering" of the images would be unacceptable.


Canon used to make a special kit for the 1Ds that would not allow any editing without triggering some sort of red flag. It was supposed to be for crime scene photography.

I dunno if they ever brought that down to the lower price cameras or what happened to it. It might be worth checking out.

Edit: Here it is: Canon Data Verification Kit. Seems it will work with the the 20D.

Message edited by author 2006-08-30 19:29:55.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/08/2025 03:54:45 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/08/2025 03:54:45 AM EDT.