DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> Opinions of...
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 6 of 6, (reverse)
AuthorThread
08/12/2006 05:01:29 PM · #1
the Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G VR.

There is one I'm looking at and wanted some opinions from anyone that has used one or has one. Price asked from seller is $450 US.

Thanks.
08/12/2006 05:42:00 PM · #2
N-E-Body??
08/12/2006 05:45:27 PM · #3
not too bad from what i remember. 24-120 is a pretty wide range, personally i'd stick to lenses that are meant for one thing: ie telephoto, 85 mm portrait, 50 mm ect.

but 450 sounds like a fair price if its in good shape.
08/12/2006 07:02:05 PM · #4
I wouldn't buy it, but that's just me.

I'm pretty sure it got widely mixed reviews.

I know the 18-200 VR is more expensive, but it's a much better lens..and where it really shines is that it's much more versatile. I personally think that in no time at all, you won't even touch the lens.

The only two lenses you really need are (Nikon or Tokina 12-24 OR Sigma 10-20) and (Sigma 70-200 2.8 with or without teleconverter).

Anything else is more specialty in my opinion....there's nothing wrong with having some specialty stuff if you have a reason for it...but like I said, that 24-120 just doesn't fit no matter what use you think you'll have for it now.
08/12/2006 07:11:56 PM · #5
I have the 18-200 VR and love it. I think you should save a little more and get the wider range lens. I rarely take this lens off my camera. When I do, it is to shoot macro with my 105mm f2.8 .
08/14/2006 01:24:28 PM · #6
Thanks everyone. I ended up going ahead with the purchase for quite a bit less than the $450 us on ebay. It's a perfect lens (I think) for me as I do quite a bit of low light work (concerts with stage lights etc) and I think between the reach and range of it coupled with the 50 mm 1.8 I have coming I should be able to cover all my bases.

Still would welcome any other opinions/experiences.

The 18-200 VR was simply just too much $$ right now to just "try it on" and see if it was what I needed. The price was definitely right for the lens.

Thanks again.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 01/02/2026 09:44:53 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/02/2026 09:44:53 PM EST.