| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/07/2006 08:32:20 AM · #26 |
Im still trying out different things, but I think I enjoy being a Nature Photographer the most. But the weddings, senior portraits, etc.. bring in the money for the filters, lenses...
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 08:40:50 AM · #27 |
| I'm the type of photographer who would like to be good but isn't....I believe that's referred to as a wannabe |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 09:06:53 AM · #28 |
| I would call myself a amatuer landscape photographer, specifically sunrises and sunsets. |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 09:19:04 AM · #29 |
| I'm more of your 'Don't give up your day job' type of photographer. (Which is a pity as I'd really like to give up my day job!) |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 09:20:40 AM · #30 |
hmm...I guess I'm a nature, flower, dog photographer. I use to not shooting people but I do now. Love capturing things in its natural state.
g
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 09:21:22 AM · #31 |
| One of those 24 digital pictures a second filmmakers (aka video) who is doing still photography in order to become better at visualizing images for directing and cinematography and who mostly just takes candids of his cats and tries to make his friends feel beautiful. Erm, type of photographer. |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:09:51 AM · #32 |
Originally posted by Makka:
I'm a crappy one! ;) |
Originally posted by crayon:
I'm the shy type who dare not shoot strangers in public places |
Originally posted by JRalston:
...the not creative type |
Originally posted by Azrifel:
A lazy one.
Should shoot more. |
Originally posted by Melethia:
Slightly below average, no discernible style. |
Originally posted by Shutterpug:
I'm the type of photographer who would like to be good but isn't....I believe that's referred to as a wannabe |
Originally posted by Qiki:
I'm more of your 'Don't give up your day job' type of photographer. (Which is a pity as I'd really like to give up my day job!) |
Damn, you people are stealing my style! :) |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:24:10 AM · #33 |
Originally posted by ShutterPug:
I'm the type of photographer who would like to be good but isn't....I believe that's referred to as a wannabe |
Hee... I guess that describe me too! |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:26:33 AM · #34 |
| I do not know yet what style of photographer I am you tell me? |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:43:09 AM · #35 |
I guess I'd be called a "collector" type of photographer. I don't sit there for hours on end examining the shot. I take it and run to the next thing. :)
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:43:59 AM · #36 |
i'm a portrait and macro photographer
i want to be a candid/street photographer
(damn suburbs) |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 10:47:35 AM · #37 |
Originally posted by hopper:
i'm a portrait and macro photographer
i want to be a candid/street photographer
(damn suburbs) |
Stick to portrait and macro (product)... you're very good at it.. :)
 |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 11:13:13 AM · #38 |
thanks, eric
Originally posted by Cheerz:
Originally posted by hopper:
i'm a portrait and macro photographer
i want to be a candid/street photographer
(damn suburbs) |
Stick to portrait and macro (product)... you're very good at it.. :)
|
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 11:15:49 AM · #39 |
Conceptual would cover it I think.
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 11:17:16 AM · #40 |
| I take pictures of ugly things. "Emotive"? |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 11:24:46 AM · #41 |
Iâm an eclectic photographer. Nothing ever seems to go together well.
I learned that one from my wife who when I say, âthat does not match the rest of the stuff in the roomâ she always says âitâs an eclectic look.â
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 11:40:36 AM · #42 |
| I don't think I have a style yet. I shoot anything and everything. I guess I'm kind of ok at shooting everything, and not particularly great at any one thing. Maybe I should start focusing more on something specific instead of spreading myself around so much? I do wish I had a recognizable style though. |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 11:44:25 AM · #43 |
| I am a "not ever completly satisfied" photographer. I like images of nature, scenic and my dogs. I have no idea what catagory that would be in. |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 12:01:55 PM · #44 |
Originally posted by bcoble:
I am a "not ever completly satisfied" photographer. I like images of nature, scenic and my dogs. I have no idea what catagory that would be in. |
I gota learn that from you...
I guess I'm the complete opposite..
I tend take time to "enjoy" what I've shot...
Then derive the top of the world feeling from what I've shot...
Following which ... boost my ego by self praise...
I'm an ego monster...
kekeke
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 12:05:46 PM · #45 |
Originally posted by Louis:
I take pictures of ugly things. "Emotive"? |
Is this one of it?
It's so ugly.. that's it's beautiful...
:)
I love this shot.. |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 12:15:31 PM · #46 |
Most people don't seem to be taking the original question "seriously", which is totally fine :-) Those that DO take it seriously seem to be mostly classifying themselves by their preferred subject, so to speak, which I find a little strange. That makes sense, up to a point, for a professional photographer, but not for an amateur IMO.
If it were me, I'd chick the whole question and replace it with "How would you define the way you see?"
I'm more interested in whether people consider themselves literal or figurative, conscious or unconscious, structural vs found (built images vs captured images) and so forth.
Robt.
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 12:17:41 PM · #47 |
| Obsessive/Compulsive Autistic Photographer |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 12:22:45 PM · #48 |
| Literal, unconscious, found. and flexible. |
|
|
|
08/07/2006 12:25:39 PM · #49 |
Originally posted by idnic:
The grumpy kind. Seems I can't manage more than 5 hours sleep at a time lately. When did I ask to be the mother of teens?? Ugh! GO BACK TO SCHOOL! |
That's what I'm talkin' bout. Get out of my house people.
|
|
|
|
08/07/2006 12:34:55 PM · #50 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Most people don't seem to be taking the original question "seriously", which is totally fine :-) Those that DO take it seriously seem to be mostly classifying themselves by their preferred subject, so to speak, which I find a little strange. That makes sense, up to a point, for a professional photographer, but not for an amateur IMO.
If it were me, I'd chick the whole question and replace it with "How would you define the way you see?"
I'm more interested in whether people consider themselves literal or figurative, conscious or unconscious, structural vs found (built images vs captured images) and so forth.
Robt. |
Interesting point. So how do you define the way you see?
Message edited by author 2006-08-07 12:35:16. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/16/2025 03:39:23 PM EDT.
