DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> IR control for flashes - Cross Brand possible?
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 16 of 16, (reverse)
AuthorThread
08/02/2006 09:46:24 AM · #1
Ok, here's the ultimate question....

Can a Sigma 500DG Super control a Canon 580EX (or other EX flash)?

Likewise, can a Canon 580EX control a Sigma flash?

I'm just curious to see if things are standardized or proprietary.

It's getting darned close to time for me to get a flash.
08/03/2006 08:24:38 AM · #2
Woo... quiet around here...

Any ideas?
08/03/2006 10:00:21 AM · #3
hummmmm, yup pretty quiet still. My Canon 580EX can control my Alien Bees so there is compatibility with them.
08/03/2006 11:37:15 AM · #4
Cool. Great news.

I wonder if the Alien Bees setup is also controllable by the IR control with the Nikon system...

Of course, the Alien Bees is a bit of a different purpose, being more along the lines of studio lighting, intended to work with the big name brands...

What about competitor brands?

For example, can a Nikon or Sigma flash be controlled by a Canon?

What about a Nikon or Sigma controlling a Canon?

Thanks for the info!
08/06/2006 08:02:47 AM · #5
bump for the last few questions
08/06/2006 08:06:40 AM · #6
I would have ASSUMED that the different brands would have different "codes" just so everyone's not triggering each others' slaves all the time; like garage door openers or something. But I suspect that assumption would prove wrong, so I won't make it :-)

R.
08/06/2006 09:31:10 AM · #7
Same here bear... that's why I'm so curious...

On one hand, I can see that the makers of Alien Bees would naturally make them cross-compatible.

BUT, recent playings around with PC Sync cables have led me to wonder if there may indeed be more in common than one would assume...

Would a Metz unit be able to be controlled?

A friend of mine has some rather expensive Metz gear as well as an older 550EZ for sale. I don't think he's ever tried it as a controlled unit though...

I'm still trying to get my hands on his 50mm f/1.8 Mark I though... ;)

To clarify (and possibly put my foot in my mouth ;), I would be curious as to whether the cross-branded flashes could control each other for the basic function (just a simple 'fire') and possibly also the Commander mode, which would involve two-way IR communication.

Additionally, some wireless devices are channel specific (garage door openers are low band FM I thought), whereas other devices are IR and are quite cross-compatible... For example, Remote Controls for TVs in-brand, and Air Conditioning units (often cross-brand compatible).

Message edited by author 2006-08-06 09:32:48.
08/06/2006 12:45:48 PM · #8
Originally posted by eschelar:


Additionally, some wireless devices are channel specific (garage door openers are low band FM I thought), whereas other devices are IR and are quite cross-compatible... For example, Remote Controls for TVs in-brand, and Air Conditioning units (often cross-brand compatible).


My programmable remote for my Cable box is an IR device, and it has in the instructions a full 3 pages of different codes for different specific brands and devices, so it is programmable to activate up to 3 devices... This was what my assumption was based on, actually. You're right the garage door openers are radio devices.

R.
08/06/2006 09:16:04 PM · #9
When I have my Pentax flash on wireless any flash will set it off.
08/06/2006 11:53:33 PM · #10
Interesting. Which Pentax flash do you use?

Are you referring to using it to activate from the slave flash or from the IR control?

Have you tried it with an IR unit operating in commander mode (sends a signal to fire the flash, but does not actually fire the flash itself... might fire the pre-flashes, but if your flash unit responds to that, you aren't going to get a very well exposed pic)...

Bear - while I've used some IR controllers that use different channels (probably an init string of some sort?), my experience in Taiwan is that most companies that are diligent about this will make them non-cross compatible (usually internationally available brands), but companies that are just creating copies and knockoffs aren't always so diligent and sometimes have more than one brand that can control them...

Air Conditioners are often cross-brand compatible here... I work in a couple of schools that have several multiple brands, but often one or two controllers covers 4-5 brands of AC units... The function of an AC unit makes sense that it would be cross compatible...

I could see some reasoning that would make flashes cross-compatible, and other reasons that would not...

I seem to recall reading that the 580EX has the ability to control a couple of different channels as a commander. This would indicate to me that there are specific channels that they paid attention to as they were making them.

On the other hand, Sigma may or may not have this... It may be that without the proper Canon signatures, the Sigma cannot control the Canon flash...

However, it may also be that the Canon can control a Sigma which may ignore the identification string...

Don't know until someone who owns both lets us all in on this.
08/07/2006 12:13:40 AM · #11
Originally posted by eschelar:

Interesting. Which Pentax flash do you use?



Slave flash mode :j
10/09/2006 10:30:14 AM · #12
I want to bring this one back up as it seems relevant and has not yet been answered.
10/09/2006 10:49:26 AM · #13
I seem to remember reading somewhere that Sigma flashes can, indeed, speak "Canon" in IR wireless ETTL mode.

Try here

or here
10/09/2006 11:00:24 AM · #14
One option would be an optical slave trigger that you'd mount a flash on so when your master flash goes off, the slave "sees" the flash and triggers the flash mounted to it, much like how slave strobes work without connecting them all via p/c cords. But, you'd have to manually set the output of your flash. I've never used these, so I can't speak from experience on how well they work.
10/09/2006 12:02:01 PM · #15
Originally posted by Telehubbie:

One option would be an optical slave trigger that you'd mount a flash on so when your master flash goes off, the slave "sees" the flash and triggers the flash mounted to it, much like how slave strobes work without connecting them all via p/c cords. But, you'd have to manually set the output of your flash. I've never used these, so I can't speak from experience on how well they work.


One of the potential problems with that is that the ETTL pre-flash can set off all the slaves.
10/10/2006 03:36:25 AM · #16
Thanks guys. Those links were great. (well the stevesforums one didn't work for me, but the first one was very good)

So according to photonotes.org, there is complete compatibility with A, B, and C channels for Sigma/Canon wireless E-TTL controller/slave functionality.

That's pretty flipping exciting.

I'd love to see some more confirmation of this... Especially considering that those notes were a bit on the old side and when they were written, the DG versions of those flashes were still a bit old...

A 500 DG Super plus a 430EX might be an interesting mix, as would a pair of Supers...

I already have a flash unit that has optical slave mode, but it's not as useful as you would think. I've had some fun with it though...

I would much prefer to have full Wireless control with a pair of flashes.

It would be even more interesting if you (for example) had a 580EX and wanted to have a controller flash on the body but didn't want to use it as a light source. The 580 could provide the light and the Sigma could be the controller....

Great versatility.

Can anyone confirm that this works?
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 01/08/2026 09:10:36 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/08/2026 09:10:36 AM EST.