| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/06/2006 11:06:22 AM · #1 |
From various posts I have determined that one should choose the
Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 APO DG MACRO
over the
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Macro Super II
However, when I view the photo examples associated with each lens, I am much more impressed with those by the Super II.
Is the DG MACRO really the better choice?
P.S. - I know that there are better telephoto lenses out there, but these seem to be the best bang for the buck (under $200). |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:16:14 AM · #2 |
Originally posted by santaspores: From various posts I have determined that one should choose the
Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 APO DG MACRO
over the
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Macro Super II
However, when I view the photo examples associated with each lens, I am much more impressed with those by the Super II.
Is the DG MACRO really the better choice?
P.S. - I know that there are better telephoto lenses out there, but these seem to be the best bang for the buck (under $200). |
Careful what you see on the internet for comparison sake. There is no shortage of bad images around...on flikr...on pbase or wherever. Enough so, not to get a proper idea of actual image quality, especially on the less expensive gear, where less experienced photographers tend to gravitate. You'll see amazing images mixed in with not so amazing images but it won't be the equipments fault.
If you have the technical skill's you can make either of those lenses deliver what you want.
edited:As you can see below...great images, both.
Message edited by author 2006-07-06 11:19:33. |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:17:03 AM · #3 |
santaspores all I can say is I'm very happy with the Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 APO DG MACRO
For both macro and telephoto work
You do get a lot of bang for your buck :) |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:17:58 AM · #4 |
Take you camera to the store and try both lenses. Take inside, outside and various zoom and f stop pics. Then go home and compare the photos by yourself.
|
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:28:31 AM · #5 |
What a strange coincidence. I'm planning on buying one of these as well.
Anyone know the difference between those two lenses (70-300 apo macro and 70-300 apo macro super II)? Even Sigma's website doesn't appear to distinguish between the two. |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:33:32 AM · #6 |
And by the way...
I should demure a bit. I have found EXCELLENT photos online produced by both of these lenses. I was speaking about my preferences as a whole and certainly not reffering to individual photos.
mkalandros - here is some info for you...
Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 APO DG MACRO canon part #508101 $183 new (check bizrate.com for example). This is the newer of the two sigma lenses.
Here is an interpretation of their lens codes:
ASP (Aspherical Lens)
The aspherical lens complex allows freedom of design, improved performance, a reduced number of component lenses and a compact size.
APO (APO Lens)
In order to attain the highest quality images, the APO lens has been made using special low-dispersion (SLD) glass and is designed to minimize color aberration.
OS (Optical Stabilizer) Function
This function utilizes a built-in mechanism that compensates for camera shake. It dramatically expands photographic possibilities by alleviating camera movement when shooting by hand held camera.
HSM (Hyper-Sonic Motor)
This lens uses a motor driven by ultrasonic waves to provide a quiet, highspeed AF.
RF (Rear Focus)
This lens is equipped with a system that moves the rear lens group for highspeed , silent focusing.
IF (Inner Focus)
To ensure stability in focusing, this lens moves the inner lens group or groups without changing the lens' physical length.
Conv (APO Teleconverter EX)
This lens can be used with the APO Teleconverter EX. It can increase the focal length and will interface with the camera's AE (automatic exposure) function.
EX (EX Lens)
The exterior of this lens is EX-finished to denote the superior build and optical quality, and to enhance its appearance.
DG (DG Lens)
These are large-aperture lenses with wide angles and short minimum focusing distances. With an abundance of peripheral illumination, they are ideal lenses for Digital SLR Cameras whilst retaining suitability for traditional 35mm SLRs.
DC (DC Lens)
These are special lenses designed so that the image circle matches the smaller size of the image sensor of most digital SLR cameras. Their specialized design gives these lenses the ideal properties for digital cameras, the compact and lightweight construction is an added bonus ! including compact and lightweight construction.
|
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:34:49 AM · #7 |
IMHO, there is no discernable difference between any of the Sigma 70-300 lenses as long as there is "APO" in the name. There is a difference between the "APO" and non-"APO" lenses, and the "APO" lenses are better.
|
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:35:00 AM · #8 |
| MudHut - Very Nice images. Have you ever tried to add a diopter lens onto your Sigma? |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:36:38 AM · #9 |
You want this one
Sigma Zoom Telephoto 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS
NOT
this one
Sigma Zoom Telephoto 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS
BOTH are DG, only ONE is APO. You want the APO.
sorry, you have a minolta...so this one is the one YOU want.
Sorry, but it'll cost you $20 more than the Canon one.
|
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:40:10 AM · #10 |
Prof_Fate - Actually, I am planning to buy a Canon 350d... the sigma will be for that. My dimage doesn't even have a removable lens.
P.S. - I view your work and comments often - thanks |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:44:00 AM · #11 |
Originally posted by mkalandros: What a strange coincidence. I'm planning on buying one of these as well.
Anyone know the difference between those two lenses (70-300 apo macro and 70-300 apo macro super II)? Even Sigma's website doesn't appear to distinguish between the two. |
Sigma is updating these lenses and changing their names on the way. 2 years ago they had tow lenses, both non-DG (DG being a lens coating for better pics with shiny digital sensors compared to film).
The APO version has different optics in teh middle there that improves the image. I think both do macro.
The Super 2 name is being dropped from what i can see and the price is less too. I got the APO Super 2 (pre-DG) version and it was listed at $240 then (a bit over a year ago). The DG version was less costly and the price is lower yet - i found this out when i went to sell mine!
|
|
|
|
07/06/2006 12:27:47 PM · #12 |
| Thanks, Prof_Fate. I suspected that it might be just a name change between the two. |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 12:32:12 PM · #13 |
Thisare also taken with this lens
My favourite
Message edited by author 2006-07-06 12:32:51.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/03/2026 02:37:24 AM EST.