DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> 30D Lens
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 6 of 6, (reverse)
AuthorThread
04/26/2006 07:29:13 PM · #1
Should I get the 17-40 f4 L or 10-22 f3.5 EF-S with my new 30D?

I will use it for landscape and distorted portaiture (a style I like).

They are the same price (almost), so that's not a factor.
04/26/2006 07:38:06 PM · #2
Also, does anyone know where the best 30D price is (a reputable place).
04/26/2006 07:44:33 PM · #3
Personally, I would say get the 17-40 as not only is it an AMAZING lens, but I think that it is more versatile. Honestly though, it completely depends on what you think you are going to shoot more of though.

As for a dealer, you can't really beat B&H in terms of quality and price.
04/26/2006 07:52:26 PM · #4
there is a guy selling a 30D with a kit lens new on fredmiranda

//www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/388428
04/26/2006 08:13:11 PM · #5
The 17-40 is too long on a 1.6x crop for wide landscape (unless you stitch) and similarly it does not have that distortion between near and far subjects like you might expect unless it is on a full frame sensor.

For what you are into, the 10-22mm sounds like the much more compatible choice to your style.

I received my 10-22mm today and am already quite amazed with it. Basically it feels like my 17-40mm when that lens is mounted on my film cameras, the only ones I have that are "full frame" so to speak. And that is a wonderful sight - at 10mm the sweeping view is really something. I wish I had gotten off the fence and bought this lens sooner.

In all likelihood I will sell the 17-40mm unless I decide to hold onto it for a future full frame digital SLR down the road. I have a 24-70mm F/2.8, so the 10-22mm is an excellent complement in terms of filling the focal range below it. I have a feeling the 17-40mm will be sitting idle a lot.
04/27/2006 02:10:59 AM · #6
I'll second Rich's views. The 10-22 is roughly equivalent to the view from a 16-35mm.

It's pretty funkalicious. I just helped my friend to buy one on the same day I got my camera and it's seriously nice in every way.

If you want to get something a bit longer, you can add the very affordable Tamron 28-75 and get a nice complement as well without breaking the bank.

That's the combo I will be going for once my wallet recovers...
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/24/2025 09:35:11 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/24/2025 09:35:11 AM EDT.