DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Tips, Tricks, and Q&A >> PS 7.0 and Memory
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 13 of 13, (reverse)
AuthorThread
04/22/2006 04:42:32 AM · #1
OK, so I'm doing some photos by hand, a lot of them, this afternoon and I've noticed that when I edit a photo, then close the pic, the memory in Photoshop doesn't get flushed.

When I use the clipboard to do something with layers, I notice that in the edit menu, I am able to PURGE the clipboard. Photoshop went right back down to 10MB used.

EDIT: This appeared to have only occured the one time. I don't really understand this, but it doesn't do that anymore. I'm still sitting at 260MB.

I currently have PS running, but I don't have anything open and it's using 227MB (the max it is allowed).

Is this OK? Is it advisable to change anything? Is it just allocated and not doing anything?

I have 512MB of RAM, of which my computer uses a fair bit in general operations. Something like 220MB (Thanks to Microsoft and Acer for not including a proper version of Windows that can be customized properly).

On another semi-related note, Whenever I do Canvas Size for my borders, the default is in inches. I would like the default to be pixels.

I couldn't find this in preferences.

Pardon my being a PS dum dum. I am learning as I go.

Message edited by author 2006-04-22 05:00:15.
04/22/2006 04:59:38 AM · #2
Edit>Preferences>Units and Rulers> Set Pixel

Edit>Preferences>Memory & Image Cache>Increase the Maximum

Close PS7 and the settings will reset when you reopen PS7
04/22/2006 05:02:04 AM · #3
Adding RAM will really help with editing, especially if you have many multiple layers.
04/22/2006 05:07:13 AM · #4
Thank you. I spent all my money on my 30D. I have lenses to buy.

I really don't find a major slowdown when using 250MB for most of the stuff I do. Most stuff takes 1-2 seconds or less. It chugs now and again on the odd thing here and there, but otherwise it's ok.

The Units and Rulers I had already done, but forgot to hit OK. Stupid mistake. Going back and rechecking it found my problem. Excellent! 12 seconds saved per picture! :)

I find it runs a bit better when I'm only giving it 220-250MB (I gave it 220MB and it uses 260MB (?), possibly because it isn't using swap as much.

I was considering going to 1GB of RAM, but this OS seems to be soooo piggy when it comes to RAM. I will wait until I upgrade again in a couple of years maybe. Or if I can find the time to rework my OS.
04/22/2006 07:23:10 AM · #5
What Os are you using???? if Xp, try increasing your virtual memory too,
go Control Panel/system/advanced/virtual mem.
Also there are available several programs designed to free up ram memory when it is not released
04/22/2006 12:09:48 PM · #6
Yeah, it's WinXP Tablet edition. There seems to be around an extra 80MB of RAM allocated to Tablet stuff over a non-tablet factory WinXP install (my sister uses nearly an identical laptop without tablet and her computer uses 120-140MB of RAM out of 512).

I like the Tablet functionality, but I am absolutely incensed that they continually hold the technology back by restricting the hardware when compared to mainstream computers. Having said that, There is no reason it shouldn't be able to handle a fairly decent load. It's not exactly a slow machine by the specs.

I find that the machine slows down when it starts using the virtual memory, so I try to avoid it as much as possible. If I can tell photoshop to be more frugal with it's RAM, I would rather do that.

I've got a non-official copy of windows that I use for testing people's computers and helping clean viruses that puts WinXP with almost all the same functionality on a computer with a cold boot footprint of 67MB-84MB (depending on the machine). The machines that I have built with that OS FLLLLLYYYY. I can't use that on my computer though because a: it's a non-legal copy, so I wouldn't want to run my computer full-time with it, and b: it's missing some tablet stuff.

I could probably modify it, but....

Anyhow, since I changed the RAM to 225MB or so, things seem to be running a lot better. Some things have slowed down but other things have sped up... A liveable tradeoff.
04/22/2006 12:14:58 PM · #7
Photoshop has always assigned its own "scratch disk" allocations, so increasing system "virtual memory" should really have no effect.

What might help is getting another hard disk (or partitioning the current one) to assign PS a large scratch disk space which is unused by the OS or other programs, and is empty of data files. This could be an external disk -- you'll just have to assign it in PS and maybe restart.

Message edited by author 2006-04-22 12:15:23.
04/22/2006 12:24:05 PM · #8
Thanks gen, it's a good idea, but my external disk is currently out on loan to the guy who is lending my his EOS 1n and 85mm 1.8...

I'm content with speed as it is. I was just concerned that it wasn't flushing the memory from one file to the next. The performance got worse and worse as I went from picture to picture, so I was guessing (and to some degree I still think this might be so) that PS is storing information as it is used that stays active from pic to pic.

From a cold start it only takes like 6 seconds to load PS 7.0 and I have a number of useful things I can do in those 6 seconds. I can practice counting my fingers, I can practice uhhhh... counting on my fingers backwards... Well anyways, I don't experience significant slow-down on anything except for some of the more bizarre filters.

If I get a bigger computer at a future date, I will probably look into getting CS2. For now, my next upgrade will probably be in pumping the HD up to a 100GB and toying with my OS install.
04/22/2006 01:43:48 PM · #9
Just as a side-note, if you close PS and then restart it (making sure to save everything first), it will dump anything utilizing the memory or scratch disks and re-allocate the new space.

I still haven't figured out how to make the default in pixels as opposed to inches in canvas size, but I've recorded some actions for my common borders and just run those when I need to.
04/23/2006 06:07:39 AM · #10
If you go to CS2 you will definitely need more ram, I am running CS2 on my new machine with 2 gig of ram, it now flys along and that is compared to my old machine which had 1gig of ram
CS2 takes all the ram you can throw at it.!!!
04/23/2006 06:19:25 AM · #11
Originally posted by rayz1:

If you go to CS2 you will definitely need more ram, I am running CS2 on my new machine with 2 gig of ram, it now flys along and that is compared to my old machine which had 1gig of ram
CS2 takes all the ram you can throw at it.!!!


And you can never have too much disk space.
04/23/2006 10:47:41 AM · #12
Telehubbie, thanks for your tips. I actually do know that closing and re-opening PS can flush the memory, but doing that for every pic seems silly. If it is the case that once it opens a file, it uses up to it's limit of RAM, and when it closes, it merely retains a claim on the RAM, it is quite possible that this is merely a problem of appearances... On the other hand, if the computer sees that all of the RAM has been allocated, it will let other programs run in virtual memory which is significantly slower. Oh and the answer for the question on inches to pixels is in the second or third post in this thread:

Go to edit>preferences>units&measurements> change the ruler to pixels. This will change the ruler to pixels as well as the canvas size will default to pixels rather than inches. This is actually just fine because inches is somewhat irrelevant for in-computer processing that is meant for the net or other digital applications. Inches may come in handy when you want to print something out, but it's just as likely that you can figure the inches out in your head based on what you intend to print the picture out at.

The next thing I will be learning is how to add actions and build them myself. I am pretty new at this.

Regarding my RAM, I don't have the money for that yet. I am more likely to see much greater results in simply cleaning up my OS build because I don't think it's very streamlined. We will have to see.

Lately I have been taking an 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' POV towards computers...

Rayz1, that is precisely the reason I have not yet upgraded to CS2. Maybe in a year if I have the money, I will upgrade to a desktop replacement and a graphire tablet pad (I really do like the handwriting capabilities), but until then, PS7.0 is it. Heck, I don't even know how to do actions yet... what would I do with CS2? :)
04/23/2006 11:37:08 AM · #13
Photoshop has always been known to have memory leaks. That is, it does not free up memory resorces that it uses, even if it doesn't need them. With Photoshop 7.0 and 7.01 I found that if I was working on a lot of pictures that it got slower and slower as I worked. And I had lots of memory and the scratch disks on their own hard drive. I almost always rebooted my computer after a long session with Photoshop 7... and sometimes in the middle of long sessions just to keep all the memory free.

Photoshop CS2 is better. I don't have to reboot and though other programs will slow down (Photoshop is still a memory hog), usually I just close them and re-start them and they are back to normal.

Mike
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/07/2025 06:40:10 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/07/2025 06:40:10 PM EDT.