| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/31/2006 03:14:30 PM · #1 |
Seems like there is something missing from this. Anyone else think the same?
Would really appreciate some comments...
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
03/31/2006 03:17:56 PM · #2 |
| For me the light wood steals my eye from the subject. I would darken the wood or change the crop so the subject was emphasized.. or to use the current phrase "pops". |
|
|
|
03/31/2006 03:22:10 PM · #3 |
I totally agree - darken the wood to draw the attention to the cute sleepy puppy and it will be awesome - regardless of if the reflection remains there or not.
Great image!
|
|
|
|
03/31/2006 03:34:13 PM · #4 |
Reflection notwithstancing, the image is MUCH stronger if you crop out nearly all the floor and make it a very horizontal aspect ratio. As posted, the image divides into two halves and the foreground contributes little or nothing to our appreciation of the very cute puppy.
Robt.
|
|
|
|
03/31/2006 03:40:08 PM · #5 |
| My first thought as well was to crop from the bottom to about a 2:1 panoramic. Another option (popularized in another recent thread) might be a tight portrait in square format. |
|
|
|
03/31/2006 03:43:52 PM · #6 |
| Gorgeous puppy.....would love to see this shot in warm b/w. |
|
|
|
03/31/2006 03:56:44 PM · #7 |
I agree with the comments about both darkening the floor and cropping tighter. Very cute pup
|
|
|
|
03/31/2006 04:03:33 PM · #8 |
Thanks for all the suggestions so far. I'll see what I can do with it this weekend sometime. I knew it needed something different... Thanks again.
Originally posted by ShutterPug:
I agree with the comments about both darkening the floor and cropping tighter. Very cute pup |
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/18/2025 07:15:47 PM EDT.
