| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/12/2007 11:01:05 PM · #26 |
I've been using NI since I can remember. I even bought a licensed copy, which I lost the serial # to, so now I'm just using the trial version anyway. But I tried NN and it never worked well for me. Things just seem to flow really nicely in NI.
|
|
|
|
06/13/2007 12:19:30 AM · #27 |
I've had the opposite experience from deapee. I find Noise Ninja very intuitivte. You can run it on default setting and allow the program to profile the file and reduce the noise for you and it still comes out better than NI. As for sharpening you can add it right into the noise reduction sequnce. If there is an area you want to reduce the amount of noise reduction to increase sharpness it is an easy process.
|
|
|
|
06/13/2007 11:00:06 PM · #28 |
Read this thread I started and see if it helps you any
Link
Message edited by author 2007-06-13 23:00:40.
|
|
|
|
06/13/2007 11:38:50 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by Lowcivicman99:
Read this thread I started and see if it helps you any
Link |
The problem with that whole thread is that it was tested on a reduced size image. Do the same testing on a full size image to really get a snese for what they do. As someone mentioned in the thread Noise Ninja works best on the original image, before any adjustments are made.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/20/2025 04:17:13 AM EDT.
