Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Originally posted by alexsaberi:
Originally posted by dsmeth:
That's a pretty impressive list of owners. Thanks Glen!! |
ok, this is a lovely lens but to be honest. The photos u see are at 640 pixels on a monitor. At a blown up print size, u WILL see differences in the optics. the tamron is inferior to the 24-70L no doubt about it. |
This is simply not true. Granted, we're LOOKING at 640-pixel images here, but you're way off base if you think I, or even the majority of Tamron owners, judge our lenses on this. I have an Epson wide-format printer, and regularly do 13x19 inch prints. I have a background in photography spanning 40 years. I have worked with some of the best equipment in the world. Take it from me, or not, as you choose, but this particular Tamron is an exceptionally nice piece of optics, easily comparable to Canon L-glass.
In fact, I DID compare it to the Canon 24-70L before making the purchase. There's no real-world difference between the two, IMO. It's one of the great bargains in the lens world.
R. |
sorry but in my opinion and with my young eyes I can see diffences between the 2.
Better to have captured the satuartion and sharpness etc IN CAMERA than is photoshop
:-) |
