| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/22/2006 01:50:28 PM · #76 |
| I think people overestimate print sizes possible, at least if you want to maintain decent quality. at 16x20 one of my scans from a med. format slide, put next to a photo from a d70 (with a great lens the 80-200 2.8)...the d70 print just doesnt look as good. its ok but its rougher, noisier, and the colors just arent as good. going bigger than 16x20 for most dslrs is a pretty weighty stretch in my opinion, you can see some difference. yikes. |
|
|
|
02/22/2006 02:15:35 PM · #77 |
| So whats a good MP count for a print of 16x20? |
|
|
|
02/22/2006 02:51:59 PM · #78 |
| I'm gonna have to disagree with petrakka. I have a 16x24 on my wall from my 6MP 300D. I think it looks excellent. He may be noticing fundamental differences between scanning and digital and prefer the scan. |
|
|
|
02/22/2006 04:55:02 PM · #79 |
| Did I saw 100,000 shutter durability somewhere? |
|
|
|
02/22/2006 06:06:12 PM · #80 |
Originally posted by petrakka:
I think people overestimate print sizes possible, at least if you want to maintain decent quality. at 16x20 one of my scans from a med. format slide, put next to a photo from a d70 (with a great lens the 80-200 2.8)...the d70 print just doesnt look as good. its ok but its rougher, noisier, and the colors just arent as good. going bigger than 16x20 for most dslrs is a pretty weighty stretch in my opinion, you can see some difference. yikes. |
That's cause it wasn't a Canon... ;-)
Canon 20D, noisy camera...quiet pictures! |
|
|
|
02/22/2006 06:07:06 PM · #81 |
Originally posted by pitsaman:
Did I saw 100,000 shutter durability somewhere? |
Yes - It was on the Canon site. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/30/2025 08:00:53 AM EDT.
