**WARNING ** may offend some / not child safe ?

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM

02/19/2006 07:27:18 PM · #26

Originally posted by cfischl:

Hate to break it to you, but as a "kid" (I'll be 15 in two days) I can tell you that most kids have seen a whole lot more than you think. Unless you keep you kid in a cave completely sheltered from society, there is very little that they haven't seen or heard about already.

How did you get out of your cave, dammit?!! ;-)

hsteg

Fujifilm X-T20

02/19/2006 07:33:54 PM · #27

Originally posted by American_Horse:

Originally posted by rex:

Originally posted by American_Horse:

By the way, this is not an adult only site.

Maybe not but if parents do their job this won't be seen by any. I know if my child was active on this site I would llok at all the photos in a challenge before I let them rate them. I would also be there with them as I am now when they are on ther interent.

Not ALL parents are diligent, or responsable.

So then why is it DPC's responsibility?

zeuszen

Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM

02/19/2006 07:36:48 PM · #28

Originally posted by HBunch:

I said it was fine, but then received a message from another SC member that it may not be fine, so I reposted saying that I'll get an answer on weather or not it's fine or not. I supose if this dissapears, it's not fine...

I said the weather's fine but then it may not be fine, so I'll say it's not, wether it is or not in which case it's gone.

love

Canon EOS-500D Rebel T1i

02/19/2006 07:39:32 PM · #29

Originally posted by zeuszen:

Originally posted by HBunch:
I said it was fine, but then received a message from another SC member that it may not be fine, so I reposted saying that I'll get an answer on weather or not it's fine or not. I supose if this dissapears, it's not fine...

I said the weather's fine but then it may not be fine, so I'll say it's not, wether it is or not in which case it's gone.

well said

Art Roflmao

Canon EOS-6D Mark II

02/19/2006 07:43:51 PM · #30

Originally posted by fotoshootme:

Originally posted by zeuszen:

Originally posted by HBunch:
I said it was fine, but then received a message from another SC member that it may not be fine, so I reposted saying that I'll get an answer on weather or not it's fine or not. I supose if this dissapears, it's not fine...

I said the weather's fine but then it may not be fine, so I'll say it's not, wether it is or not in which case it's gone.

well said

"Gone is the case in which it is not whether I'll say so and be it not fine but then so is the weather."

-said well (roughly backwards) :)

Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX Aspherical DG DF for Minolta

02/19/2006 07:49:09 PM · #31

personally i think we're ignoring a bigger issue here.

when a woman can look at that picture and not immediatelly put as much clothing on as possible on then the actual content of the photo is not what we should be questioning.

MrEd

Sony DSLR-A100

02/19/2006 07:52:07 PM · #32

Originally posted by pawdrix:

Unfortunately, that Cheese image will not freakin go away now for even longer. It has more life breathed into it with each passing day. It should be titled "The Image That Wouldn't Die"

02/19/2006 08:00:08 PM · #33

Originally posted by sickdog:

and why would a woman feel the need to suddenly put on a ton of clothing just by looking at the photo?

Art Roflmao

Canon EOS-6D Mark II

Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH

02/19/2006 08:03:43 PM · #34

Originally posted by ShutterPug:

Originally posted by sickdog:
personally i think we're ignoring a bigger issue here.

when a woman can look at that picture and not immediatelly put as much clothing on as possible on then the actual content of the photo is not what we should be questioning.

and why would a woman feel the need to suddenly put on a ton of clothing just by looking at the photo?

Yeah, I dunno about that - but I do know that photo has made me give up dairy products. ;-)

Olyuzi

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

02/19/2006 08:10:25 PM · #35

rex

Canon PowerShot SD780

02/19/2006 08:11:26 PM · #36

click............clique?

Message edited by author 2006-02-19 20:17:20.

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6

02/19/2006 08:12:53 PM · #37

okay. now i'm not saying that he's not a handsome man at all. but that picture, in that pose, with that cheese is about as sexually apealling as a cold wet brick... dropped from the fifteenth floor of a dillapitated building somewhere in downtown oakland.

i'm not saying i dont like the pic either... i think it's hilarious...

but sexual?

youngnova

Canon EOS-50D

02/19/2006 08:13:56 PM · #38

Question to SC... So it is ok for 2 photographers to kinda collaborate ideas and enter similar images? Our would that be grounds for DQ as well?

02/19/2006 08:14:53 PM · #39

Originally posted by sickdog:

roflmao......Leroy is gonna die laughing when he reads this. The cheese pic is what made mine so funny. Without the cheese pic it wouldnt have meant a thing.

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II

02/19/2006 08:19:06 PM · #40

oh no...

dont get me wrong. i loved your pics in that challenge i and i dont think that they should have been DQed. there's something seriously wrong with that.

but lets face it. a woman thinking of doing anything but running like hell from "the cheese pic" should raise some serious questions.

rex

Canon PowerShot SD780

02/19/2006 08:19:07 PM · #41

Originally posted by youngnova:

Question to SC... So it is ok for 2 photographers to kinda collaborate ideas and enter similar images? Our would that be grounds for DQ as well?

in the room challenge a bunch of us collaborated on the bathroom.

Dim7

Canon EOS R

02/19/2006 08:24:00 PM · #42

Originally posted by Art Roflmao:

Originally posted by ShutterPug:

Originally posted by sickdog:
personally i think we're ignoring a bigger issue here.

when a woman can look at that picture and not immediatelly put as much clothing on as possible on then the actual content of the photo is not what we should be questioning.

and why would a woman feel the need to suddenly put on a ton of clothing just by looking at the photo?

Yeah, I dunno about that - but I do know that photo has made me give up dairy products. ;-)

lol

swankFoto

Fujifilm X-E1

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

02/19/2006 08:25:13 PM · #43

Thanks Olyuzi, for posting two pics that also show sex acts with the same degree of explicitness as the one in question.
Maybe SickDog is onto something.
Better looking models are acceptable but not so attractive ones are not?

I was so sorry and upset to see this DQ'd.
Maybe that has a bit to do with my disdain of prudish censorship.
I rated it high based on originality (until I saw the collaboration and bumped it down a notch).

Get a grip SC.

Message edited by author 2006-02-19 20:25:57.

Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D

02/19/2006 08:32:28 PM · #44

i really was just trying to make a juvenile joke and not make any kind of point at all but rswank makes a very good point.

David.C

02/19/2006 08:35:58 PM · #45

Originally posted by rswank:

In defence of the SC, they don't go looking for the images to DQ -- they are asked to look into them by site users.

I do imagine, however, these images received more invitations than many of the examples of similar depictions of intimacy -- although I don't think that should have any weight in the decision making.

David

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6

02/19/2006 08:36:56 PM · #46

Originally posted by rswank:

but not so attractive ones are not?

hmmmm - just what are you trying to tell me? ;-) I thoughy everyone would think I was gorgeous. lol

Message edited by author 2006-02-19 20:37:24.

HBunch

HP PhotoSmart 315

02/19/2006 08:39:58 PM · #47

some very fine examples posted here. Some were DQed, some were not. One was almost 2 years ago, under different rules sets, with different SC. I see no need for discussion on that photo.
Oly's examples are also good ones. There are 2 people in a bed, I see no act of sex in that photo. The 2 people could have been kissing, which has NEVER been DQed in the history of DPC. The second photo posted by oly is a little odd...he's have to have a 3ft long hoohoo in order for that photo to be representing sex.
In the 2 photos DQed, I am clearly seeing 2 people masterbating. That is an act of sex, and they were DQed.

Frankly, I'm sick and tired of being attacked and degraded in the forums, and I'm done. You guys need help with something? Call someone else, cause I've had it.

rex

Canon PowerShot SD780

02/19/2006 08:42:26 PM · #48

who is attacking you we just asked a question. RELAX

Message edited by author 2006-02-19 20:42:51.

angela_packard

Canon EOS-20D

02/19/2006 08:51:15 PM · #49

I would have to say I don't see why the image was DQ'd either...if they can show nude...and you aren't nude in this shot...then everything should be ok.