handcoloured? - DPChallenge Forums

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

01/31/2006 06:00:14 PM · #1

I've been experimenting..can you tell me if you can tell these are not entirely B+W please. Tried to go subtle with tones, but hope its not so subtle its a waste of time.

They were 35mm B+W ilford photos, printed on ilford paper (some dodging and burning), then scanned and editted in PS

Message edited by author 2006-01-31 18:01:03.

Artifacts

Canon EOS-5D Mark II

01/31/2006 06:04:19 PM · #2

Originally posted by kirsty_mcn:

I've been experimenting..can you tell me if you can tell these are not entirely B+W please. Tried to go subtle with tones, but hope its not so subtle its a waste of time.

My experience is an F717 owner can NEVER be too subtle. ;)

Tamron 70-180mm F/2.8 Di III VXD

01/31/2006 06:09:38 PM · #3

Originally posted by stdavidson:

Originally posted by kirsty_mcn:
I've been experimenting..can you tell me if you can tell these are not entirely B+W please. Tried to go subtle with tones, but hope its not so subtle its a waste of time.

My experience is an F717 owner can NEVER be too subtle. ;)

lol. howdy fellow f717er :)

MadMan2k

Sony Alpha a6400

01/31/2006 06:13:42 PM · #4

The tones are pretty subtle, but they look good. The second one, the tone of the sky looks a little strange but not bad.

01/31/2006 06:20:40 PM · #5

Originally posted by MadMan2k:

The tones are pretty subtle, but they look good. The second one, the tone of the sky looks a little strange but not bad.

hmm, yeah, i ought to colour the sky differently to the grass etc, otherwise its a greeny hue. Think i got the sky better in the horse one though