| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/10/2006 07:07:18 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by DocendoDiscimus:
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
It's plenty wide enough but it has barrel distortion up the kazoo. The 10-22mm Canon is the wisest "pure" lens I have ever seen.
R. |
Agree. Still think f3.5 is very slow, so I got a Sigma 20 1.8 ($350) and a Peleng 8 3.5 ($150 - just for fun). I found 20mm wide enough for most situations. How often do you use 10mm? |
Probably 75% of the time I use the lens.
R. |
|
|
|
01/10/2006 07:26:38 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Probably 75% of the time I use the lens.
R. |
One of the reasons I bought the 20 1.8 was that I realised I was using the kit lense as a prime since 90% of the pics were @18mm
Don't get me wrong... I think the 10-22 is a great lens... I would love to own one but I need other glass first (maybe next christmas :) )
What I meant to ask you was if use your 10-20 often (compared with your other lenses)?
|
|
|
|
01/10/2006 08:45:58 PM · #28 |
Seeing as you already have a 28-70mm zoom. I'd recommend the 10-22 rather than a 17-40.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/21/2025 07:49:39 PM EDT.
