| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/07/2005 02:53:05 AM · #1 |
Hi guys,
I want to buy this lens, but is there is a fundemental difference between the normal Canon 50mm f/1.8 and the "II" model, apart from that it's newer?
Thanks
Message edited by author 2005-12-07 02:58:54. |
|
|
|
12/07/2005 03:06:07 AM · #2 |
| The II has a plastic barrel or casing. |
|
|
|
12/07/2005 03:06:56 AM · #3 |
| Does that make a huge difference? |
|
|
|
12/07/2005 03:08:04 AM · #4 |
| Not for me. it's the same glass I believe :) Plus it's only a measely $70 :D Good price point for me :D |
|
|
|
12/07/2005 04:13:42 AM · #5 |
the II has a plastic mounting plate, whereas the I has a metal plate. Not a problem unless you are really going to be changing the lens a lot (and I mean a lot).
I've had my II for almost 3 years now and no sign of any problems.
|
|
|
|
12/07/2005 04:31:18 AM · #6 |
|
|
|
12/07/2005 04:49:39 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by Guyver:
And youre happy with it? |
I have the 50mm and its a very nice, small, compact and most importantly sharp lens. I have the tamron 28-75mm as well and since the tamron is just as good as the 50 @ 50mm i havent used my 50mm ever since getting the tamron.
|
|
|
|
12/07/2005 04:51:06 AM · #8 |
Either one is highly rated, especially for the price. The major difference on the Mark I is the metal mount, although some people insist it's marginally better optically.
If they were the same price I'd go for the Mark I but they tend to go for $100 or so on ebay and you can have a new Mark II for less.
It's on my shopping list :)
|
|
|
|
12/07/2005 04:58:09 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by Guyver:
And youre happy with it? |
Very happy - if I was buying again I would maybe look at the 1.4, but thats a different price range.
|
|
|
|
12/07/2005 09:49:57 PM · #10 |
I believe, that the I and II editions have the same optics but the I version has a metal mount, a proper focus ring, and a window scale.
I find it good for close up portraits of kids in the living room.
Good lens for the money, but I don't use it a lot. I tend to use the Tamron 17-35 with a 1.3 crop on the 1D Mark II N or the Tokina 12-24 on the XT.
Message edited by author 2005-12-07 21:51:08.
|
|
|
|
12/07/2005 09:55:59 PM · #11 |
| i think the main difference is, if you drop the 50mm II, you're out of a lens. If you drop the 50mm I, you're only maybe out of a lens. |
|
|
|
12/13/2005 12:14:04 AM · #12 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/21/2025 10:48:39 AM EDT.
