Tamron SP AF11-18mm F/4.5-5.6 - DPChallenge Forums

11/27/2005 05:13:50 PM · #1

I've been lusting after a good wide-angle and just had a chance to handle and play with Tamron's new 11-18 at National Camera Exchange in Minneapolis this weekend. I was put off by the $599 price tag, at least initially, but I'm wondering if anyone has had a chance to shoot with this lens yet? The review here seems pretty favorable and best online prices seem to be in the $570 to $590 range.

11/27/2005 05:25:01 PM · #2

Both the Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 ($499) and the Tokina 12-24mm f/4 ($500)are a full $100 cheaper than what they want for the Tamron 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6. The Tamron is $70 more than the Sigma or Tokina at B&H.

Maybe you should try the other two as well to see if it's really worth the extra $70 to $100. Both Sigma and Tokina are faster at the wider end, with the Tokina being a constant f/4.

Happy shopping.

EDIT
Just realized that you have the 10D. Not sure that body is compatible with the the Tokina, which is what I have. EF-S and like lenses don't work on the 10D since the mirror can hit the back of the lens, if I remember correctly.

Message edited by author 2005-11-27 17:26:43.

11/27/2005 05:27:17 PM · #3

Thanks BB, that's the kind of feedback I'd like. I assume you're happy with your Tokina? Works well with Canon body? Good build quality??

Just saw your edit. Bummer. I'll wait to hear more on this before I cross the Tok off my list.

Message edited by author 2005-11-27 17:27:55.

11/27/2005 05:29:51 PM · #4

The Tokina is a nice solid lens. Not L construction, but damn close. Works very well for me and I am extremely pleased with its performance. I've noticed some minimal chromatic abberation in some high contrast shots, but nothing too serious. I recommend it.

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

11/27/2005 05:32:10 PM · #5

Originally posted by strangeghost:

Just saw your edit. Bummer. I'll wait to hear more on this before I cross the Tok off my list.

I'm sure some of the more knowledgeable members here can share this info with you. Kirbic has a wealth of knowledge and this kind of stuff. Maybe check with him?

Jammur

Nikon D300

11/27/2005 05:34:43 PM · #6

As the perpetual shopper, I added it to my wishlist based on this review

Tamron SP 11-18 f/4.5-5.6 Di II LD

Not lengthy, but a picture is worth a 1000 words.

Sony 24-70mm F4 Vario-Tessar T* FE OSS

11/27/2005 06:03:06 PM · #7

Originally posted by Beagleboy:

I'm sure some of the more knowledgeable members here can share this info with you. Kirbic has a wealth of knowledge and this kind of stuff. Maybe check with him?

Nah, Kirbic is pretty much a ditz. I'll wait for other knowledgeable members to chime in.

;-)

Bear_Music

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

11/27/2005 07:14:53 PM · #8

"But, unlike Canon's EFS lenses, such as its 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, which are limited to S mount bodies such as the Rebel/XT and 20D, the Tamron will fit earlier reduced frame digital bodies such as the 10D, D60 and D30. If you put the lens on a film camera, or a full frame digital camera such as the Canon 1Ds MKII, you will not get a usable image outside of the APS-C sized format area. This lens is designed for current 1.5X and 1.6X digital cameras only."

"If you're looking for an ultra-wide zoom for your 1.5x or 1.6x lens factor DSLR then I can recommend the Tamron SP 11-18 f/4.5-5.6 Di II LD to you. The price is attractive and the lens is capable of producing high quality images. If you are the owner of a Canon D30, D60 or 10D, and therefore unable to use the Canon 10-22mm lens without performing warranty destroying surgery, the new Tamron provides an attraction option."

Go for it, I say. Looks very nice to me.

Robt.

Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS

11/27/2005 07:40:33 PM · #9

Sweet.

kirbic

Canon EOS R5

11/27/2005 09:14:54 PM · #10

Hoo, $600 for the Tammy 11-18? Boy, that would give me pause. Especially as Mr. Atkins noted that CA is visibly present, and this is a pretty darn slow lens. The alternatives for 10D owners, however, are not all that plentiful. The real performer seems to be the Canon 10-22, but 10D owners need not apply, since it's EF-S :-(
Of course, you could always do what this guy did... not!
I'm certainly no expert on the super-wides, after all you are reading a post from a guy who still owns a Tamron 19-35 f/3.5-4.5 that hasn't seen light in months, and isn't likely to again on my bodies. Hmmm, perhaps John's assessment above is closer than I'd like to think? ;-)