| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/22/2005 10:33:36 AM · #26 |
I believe it was 3 images, however, the rule that was broke was the moving of a major element in one of the three images.
|
|
|
|
11/22/2005 10:38:22 AM · #27 |
theSaj - I used an example earlier with a single image being split into three parts and was told that it would then be considered multiple images (see below), so why isn't it the same if one of the images (the double-leaf) image is split...should that one then become two.
Not a major deal...just curious as to the line of thinking/logic.
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by glad2badad:
There is one image of three leaves on a black background. That single image is cut into three seperate images and put on a new plain background - how many images are there; 1 or 3? |
Since it's illegal to move major elements, that would have to be treated as three images (each cropped from the same original). Since a plain black background isn't a photo, it's STILL three. |
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/21/2025 04:25:13 PM EDT.
