DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Challenge Results >> Feedback on an abstract...is it a keeper?
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 7 of 7, (reverse)
AuthorThread
10/26/2005 11:08:26 AM · #1
I know my motion blur abstracts are mostly a miss with voters. But I thought "What" was the perfect challenge for a motion blur abstract. Isn't "what?" what most abstracts are about?

So where did I go wrong with this one? Whereas most my abstracts score in the middle ground and garner some favorites, this one bombed (it did get one favorite, thanks, but not as many as my last, so that doesn't validate it). To take my abstracts further, I need to know if somehow this just bombed because of the challenge theme, the title, the colors, or it's just not an appealing photo.

Feel free to be as negative or as postive as you'd like. Honesty counts (as does politeness ;)).

To give you a concept of what I saw in it:

1) This is a shot that's somewhat recognizable, but the movement distortion makes it a what.
2) It looks painterly, impressionistic (yet it's completely done in camera).
3) It looks like a reflection, so it's "more mainstream" than my usual blur--but in fact it's not a reflection at all. (I thought that was cool, but of course, viewers didn't know enough to realize
4) My title was meant to "reflect" the fact that it looks like a reflection, but perhaps that hurt me given the "other" challenge?

Here's the image.



Thanks in advance. I will try to return any detailed honest critiques with the same...on a slow schedule though...

10/26/2005 11:12:52 AM · #2
When I saw this I thought you'd entered it in the wrong challenge.

There was no element of 'what?' in it for me. I recognised it straight away, and the title just confirmed what I thought it was.

Apart from the 'meeting the challenge' aspects, I really liked this - The colours and technique you used to produce it really gives it a 'painted' feel.

But I honestly thought it was a reflection.
10/26/2005 01:06:02 PM · #3
Thanks for your responses, John and Courtenay (Dahkota).

Anyone else care to critique?
10/26/2005 05:11:47 PM · #4
Come on people...let me have it...
10/26/2005 05:38:02 PM · #5
It's got texture. It's got good color. It lacks strong contrasting elements that I enjoy in abstracts. But I feel the real problem here is that there is nothing to wrap one's imagination around.
10/26/2005 06:35:42 PM · #6
Originally posted by RonBeam:

It's got texture. It's got good color. It lacks strong contrasting elements that I enjoy in abstracts. But I feel the real problem here is that there is nothing to wrap one's imagination around.


Thanks. Do you mean because you can see it's a tree? Does that apply to "What" or as an abstract/photo in general?
10/26/2005 07:55:48 PM · #7
Autumn Reflections - voted it 8...... interesting addition to your abstract study. The thing that strikes me about any of them, is that they are at this point part of a larger series with each piece contributing in a individual way to your scheme and vision, for uncertian results for your own reasons. As a member of an audience you are showing to, and from the way you present them, I think it a series of experiments with each piece like a swatch, each presented muted and blured, painted with a camera. I appreciate the obvious effort sometimes more than the results, which is especially true for colour field studies. I usually like yours less as stand alone single pieces and much more when viewed one after another. For this piece - the natural colouration is pleasing and impressionistic nuance of the tree/water image provides the subject, which is evident as you say.

Message edited by author 2005-10-26 20:13:38.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 10/21/2025 01:35:54 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/21/2025 01:35:54 PM EDT.