Author | Thread |
|
10/26/2005 08:29:10 AM · #1 |
Being caught up in baseball fever here in the Houston area, I named my entry on a whim. Of course to me, the title was the only reason that the picture fit the theme.
My question is, if I had named it Rice Dryer, (which is what is a picture of) how would people have scored it? |
|
|
10/26/2005 01:25:17 PM · #2 |
bump
I really am curious, as this is my first entry here and therefore the only time I understand the thoughts behind the title. |
|
|
10/26/2005 01:33:18 PM · #3 |
To me, it is just not an interesting composition. I wouldn't have scored it any higher with a different title. Maybe shot at a different angle or with different lighting it would have more interest. (I am origianlly from Houston--yay, the Astros finally madeit to the World Series! It would be nice if they won the next 4!) |
|
|
10/26/2005 01:34:46 PM · #4 |
Personally, I suspect the title helped, not hidnered, you. It's a pretty lackluster image, particularly when the low-contrast processing is added on, and it doesn't have any real "what" factor to it absent the title.
That it is a rice dryer is neither here nor there. Photographing a generic building and assuming I'd ask myself "what is this building's function?" is a bit of a stretch.
R.
|
|
|
10/26/2005 01:44:44 PM · #5 |
Who are the Astros, what's a rice dryer, and what do the two have to do with each other?
So it would certainly have me saying 'What?!'...
|
|
|
10/26/2005 01:45:22 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by bear_music: Personally, I suspect the title helped, not hidnered, you. It's a pretty lackluster image, particularly when the low-contrast processing is added on, and it doesn't have any real "what" factor to it absent the title.
That it is a rice dryer is neither here nor there. Photographing a generic building and assuming I'd ask myself "what is this building's function?" is a bit of a stretch.
R. |
Thanks, but there wasn't any processing done. Not really knowing anything about Photoshop (took 20 minutes just to resize it) I couldn't process it in any way that seemed to bring any zing. I'm gonna have to go through the different tutorials (your workflow one looks great) before I try to enter another challenge. This was done more to get a feel for doing more than voting and posting in forums.
Edit: Oops, now that "thanks" looks condescending to me, but I really meant it to show my appreciation.
Message edited by author 2005-10-26 13:47:54. |
|
|
10/26/2005 01:58:41 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by Delfeye:
Thanks, but there wasn't any processing done. Not really knowing anything about Photoshop (took 20 minutes just to resize it) I couldn't process it in any way that seemed to bring any zing. I'm gonna have to go through the different tutorials (your workflow one looks great) before I try to enter another challenge. This was done more to get a feel for doing more than voting and posting in forums.
Edit: Oops, now that "thanks" looks condescending to me, but I really meant it to show my appreciation. |
Didn't feel condescended to, don't worry. As to your main point, it reminds me of the Sherlock Holmes scene (I'm paraphrasing here):
Holmes: And what about the dog in the night?
Watson: There was no dog.
Holmes: Exactly!
Choosing not to process is a processing decision, if you catch my drift?
R.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/21/2025 01:35:44 PM EDT.