| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/03/2002 01:22:19 PM · #1 |
I seem to recall there was some discussion about critiques and comments, some time ago. I'd like to see some more discussion about this aspect of the site. Most of us could use some insight about critiques and comments. We all appreciate honest remarks about our photographs because we all have one thing in common: We want to improve.
Some comments, though complimentary, or amusing, don't actually point out the strengths and weaknesses of our images. Here we can improve our critique techniques, and in so doing help each other as well as ourselves.
When there are umpteen submissions to vote on, we can't all comment effectively on each and every one, but we can give some solid points of view on some.
Let's say I choose 15 or 20 to critique, it would serve the photographers well if I concentrate on a little more depth than I could have given had I tried to remark about ALL.
I propose that we all try to give real critiques, rather than many quick, short lines like "Kewl picture" or "Nice try" or "I've seen this before." Instead how about "This is a kewl picture because it uses a unique perspective that I wouldn't have seen, and the contrast of colors works so well together. I think if the contrast had been increased, the subject would stand out even more." Or "I appreciate the effort you put into this, but I think there are areas that need improvement. The angle you chose looks somewhat unnatural. Maybe that was your choice, but if not consider stepping to the right and squat down to show the context." How about "I've seen this scene before at such and such a place. I like the attempt you made to highlight the texture, but some of the coloring seems off...." Etc, etc. Critique should give a little detail about what you like and don't like about the picture.
Anyone else have ideas on this subject?
How about we recognize the constructive criticisms each week? We could nominate the ones that really do the job. It may help encourage voters to give helpful comments?
I'm gonna start right now....going to give some good, solid critiques. Anyone gonna join me???? :-)
|
|
|
|
11/03/2002 01:43:10 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
11/03/2002 02:21:18 PM · #3 |
I just found a thread from October where Amnom posting some links.
Critique thread here
|
|
|
|
11/03/2002 02:53:37 PM · #4 |
Let's practice on this old picture of mine. Originally taken with my old battle axe Nikon, and scanned. Let's just practice some critiques.
Proboscus
|
|
|
|
11/03/2002 06:03:02 PM · #5 |
| In my opinion, the monkey's tail is much too long and his coloring is very uneven. Try and pick one that is more photogenic and has a sweeter smile. Please do stay away from those with the big red butt though. |
|
|
|
11/03/2002 06:51:29 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by David Ey:
In my opinion, the monkey's tail is much too long and his coloring is very uneven. Try and pick one that is more photogenic and has a sweeter smile. Please do stay away from those with the big red butt though.
David, you made me laugh...I like that. Why don't you pick one we can critique...No need to pick on me and mine....lol We should critique the photo not the subject though, because usually the photographer chooses to photograph a subject she or he finds interesting. In this case I chose this Proboscus Monkey for his unusually dominant feature...his proboscus of course.
I'd love to see some others post pics here.
|
|
|
|
11/03/2002 08:36:07 PM · #7 |
I have a photo that I would love to get critiques on. My daughter resently had her 4th Birthday and I took some candid pictures. I could have taken better, but the kids were moving so fast. I would love to know what I could have done better or differently.
4th Birthday Party |
|
|
|
11/03/2002 09:57:20 PM · #8 |
Grayce time is the key to critiquing for me. Just can not afford the time it takes me to find the words.
As for your Jimmy Durranti of the monkey world, that's a good catach. Starting with it's nose the eye follows a circle down the black seam inthe rock. There is a slight break at the edge of the picture lower right but then the branch leads the eye back up into the picture till you get to that very big very strong hand braced on a stub of a branch that is very like the nose above it. The eye is lead right back to that FACE. lol what a face. there is something about the greenery about the monkey's head that I don't like. Too washed out I think. Can't comment on the focus as you said you scaned this in.
Still, like many, I'd rather get than give. Have you looked at my Mouse? |
|
|
|
11/03/2002 10:09:13 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Sonifo:
I have a photo that I would love to get critiques on. My daughter resently had her 4th Birthday and I took some candid pictures. I could have taken better, but the kids were moving so fast. I would love to know what I could have done better or differently.
4th Birthday Party
Right from the first look, it's clear that the children are the subject, and the colorful bags and mask identify it as a special occasion. The children are oblivious to the camera which I think is very good, quite natural. They are absorbed in activity...great! They are framed by the party bags. Good!
The blue-coated adult adds no virtue to the image, is a distraction, and could have easily been eliminated while taking the picture or cropped out afterward. Getting down to the level of the children would have improved this image. You're not too far off...just a little lower.
Overall I think this will be a treasured memory of your daughter's special day.
I hope that helps. :-)
* This message has been edited by the author on 11/3/2002 10:07:39 PM.
* This message has been edited by the author on 11/3/2002 10:16:35 PM.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/27/2025 07:51:52 PM EDT.
