| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/27/2005 01:20:23 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by w24x192:
Someone should tell BradP about this... |
Brad will probably go 20D or higher, even if it means waiting. |
Elitist scum!
|
|
|
|
08/27/2005 02:37:09 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by undieyatch:
TriX, I thought was rated 400. Kodachrome 25 is actually one of my favorites, am i confusing asa and iso..... |
Your right tri-x is offically rated at a higher iso, but few people actually use it at that iso. When I took photography back in college they had us shoot it at iso 120, but I like the results I get @ 100. It also depends on what developer your using and at what temperature.
I also often shot velvia @ iso 40 at times. |
|
|
|
08/27/2005 04:05:07 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by hyperfocal:
Originally posted by undieyatch:
TriX, I thought was rated 400. Kodachrome 25 is actually one of my favorites, am i confusing asa and iso..... |
Your right tri-x is offically rated at a higher iso, but few people actually use it at that iso. When I took photography back in college they had us shoot it at iso 120, but I like the results I get @ 100. It also depends on what developer your using and at what temperature.
I also often shot velvia @ iso 40 at times. |
I had a habit of shooting tri-x at 320 if I remember right I think I did that because of some processing requirements. |
|
|
|
08/27/2005 04:42:33 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by w24x192:
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by w24x192:
Someone should tell BradP about this... |
Brad will probably go 20D or higher, even if it means waiting. |
Elitist scum! |
Hey - Be nice! 
|
|
|
|
08/31/2005 04:25:22 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by w24x192:
Someone should tell BradP about this... |
Brad will probably go 20D or higher, even if it means waiting. |
Something like that.
<---------- 
|
|
|
|
08/31/2005 04:48:43 PM · #31 |
| There goes the neighborhood. Congrats, and welcome back to the party! |
|
|
|
08/31/2005 04:59:28 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by rikki11:
Originally posted by nsbca7:
Originally posted by rikki11:
wow! but if it's an dSLR, it didn't mention if it were a Canon or a Nikon mount? |
ha ha ha |
??? |
I think he's laughing.
Originally posted by undieyatch:
Originally posted by hyperfocal:
[quote=undieyatch]
TriX, I thought was rated 400. Kodachrome 25 is actually one of my favorites, am i confusing asa and iso..... |
Your right tri-x is offically rated at a higher iso, but few people actually use it at that iso. When I took photography back in college they had us shoot it at iso 120, but I like the results I get @ 100. It also depends on what developer your using and at what temperature.
I also often shot velvia @ iso 40 at times. |
I always use Tri-x at 400 iso, actually I shot every film with 400 now, I really can't work with any other stuff anymore, it just feels comfortable. It's fast and the results are mildly noisy. Something I really love.
|
|
|
|
08/31/2005 05:04:26 PM · #33 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
There goes the neighborhood. Congrats, and welcome back to the party! |
|
|
|
|
08/31/2005 06:24:17 PM · #34 |
Hmmph... Another TOY camera, I see... jejeje
R.
|
|
|
|
08/31/2005 06:36:39 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by BradP:
There goes the neighborhood. Congrats, and welcome back to the party! |
We all might as well give up.................Brad has a camera.........
|
|
|
|
08/31/2005 06:40:11 PM · #36 |
| The 350D is considerably less of a toy than Brad's LAST camera, and I seem to recall him doing OK with that one. I'm sure it was luck. Oh yeah, 11 ribbons in about 9 months... that was ALL luck. ;-) |
|
|
|
08/31/2005 07:14:54 PM · #37 |
oh well, looks like recess is over ;-)
have fun, brad! maybe you'll have it figured out by the time i get out there... |
|
|
|
08/31/2005 07:48:24 PM · #38 |
| Congratulations Brad! And welcome back buddy! |
|
|
|
08/31/2005 09:02:06 PM · #39 |
Congrats Brad, good to have you back...
As for the eVolt $999.00 > $899.00 > $799.00 > $539.00 in seven months just don't add up for me...I think Fry's here has finally given up trying to move the thing. Possibly it is the noise levels that start at ISO-800 that are giving people second thoughts about this one, or maybe it is cause it's just plain ugly (IMO).
Message edited by author 2005-08-31 21:02:55.
|
|
|
|
08/31/2005 09:11:03 PM · #40 |
|
|
|
08/31/2005 09:46:55 PM · #41 |
Haven't been able to wipe the off my face all afternoon...
Nice to have creativity back.
Message edited by author 2005-08-31 21:55:13.
|
|
|
|
08/31/2005 09:50:16 PM · #42 |
Is that a playboy bunny nose stud? bling!
I hope nobody took my "toy" comment seriously, LOL. Just seems like a real small camera body for a ham-fisted mechanic... jejeje�
R.
|
|
|
|
08/31/2005 10:14:44 PM · #43 |
| Mine arrived today from dell. Paid a little under $600 (I had to pay tax here in TN). It seems to be as good or better than reviews I've read. But the real test will be Friday when I get my 50-200 from adorama. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/19/2025 03:28:33 PM EDT.
