DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Photography Discussion >> "Polerizer" ????
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 14 of 14, (reverse)
AuthorThread
08/14/2005 04:04:10 PM · #1
If thats how you spell it, ha lol,
I got my Canon 24-70mm and i going to take it out this evening to the beach and shoot my wife, i dont have a polerizer yet, am i wasting my time without one, or should i get on on the way, there like 50 or 60 bucks,
08/14/2005 04:06:04 PM · #2
Originally posted by TroyMosley:

If thats how you spell it, ha lol,
I got my Canon 24-70mm and i going to take it out this evening to the beach and shoot my wife, i dont have a polerizer yet, am i wasting my time without one, or should i get on on the way, there like 50 or 60 bucks,


Polarizer. And you can get them for about $20 I think
08/14/2005 04:07:48 PM · #3
My 24-70 is a 77 MM ring, so its aroudn 50 bucks
08/14/2005 04:09:45 PM · #4
Just go for it...try it out and learn from the results.

Who knows, you may never get the chance to shoot your wife again (j/k), why not just take her photo??

Like everything, experiment with the lens.

Steve
08/14/2005 04:12:51 PM · #5
Hmmm... For that price I think you're talking about a UV filter. A decent polarizer at 77mm will cost ~$100.

08/14/2005 04:13:39 PM · #6
Well, i have a real shoot to do next weekend and im going to go test the area and some poses, look at the senery take some test photos,
08/14/2005 04:18:12 PM · #7
A polarizer is mainly used to cut glare and darken bright skies. You wouldn't really want to use one in the evening except in some special circumstances.
08/14/2005 04:20:57 PM · #8
Ok, Should i use one of the WB settings like cloudy or sunny to help my color brighter,
08/14/2005 04:34:18 PM · #9
Originally posted by TroyMosley:

Ok, Should i use one of the WB settings like cloudy or sunny to help my color brighter,


If you're not confident shooting in RAW and tweaking the WB later, you'll want to get it as close as possible in-camera. Using "sunny" will give emphasis to the reds, which may be a desirable effect. If the light is very red, try the tungsten WB (the lightbulb symbol). That will reduce the red cast somewhat. Auto WB also will usually give very pleasing results. No harm in trying all three. The alternative is to shoot a white or gray card and use a custom WB. While this techically will give the most accurate colors, it may not be appropriate to retain the "sunset feel" where whites are really not going to be pure white.
With regard to a polarizer, you want a very good polarizer, which will definitely exceed $100. You definitely want a multi-coated one for this lens; without it, the filter will greatly increase flare, and reduce contrast. I agree, BTW, that a polarizer is probably not needed for the late-day beach work.
08/14/2005 04:45:36 PM · #10
I think you should get just a polorizer and not a circulater polorizer..
so it will be cheaper and you wont have to play with the ring all the time..
i have both and i find it very easy to use just the polorizer and not cr..
get hoya if you can..
and no.. your not waisting your time... just shoot raw..

if its sunset situation then anyway you dont want to shoot portraits or moving objects with PL coz it bring down F stop like 1-2 so it better off without in low light..
08/14/2005 05:03:06 PM · #11
Originally posted by jellyoooo:

I think you should get just a polorizer and not a circulater polorizer..
so it will be cheaper and you wont have to play with the ring all the time..
i have both and i find it very easy to use just the polorizer and not cr..


Noooooo! A circular polarizer is necessary for most AF systems to function properly. In any case, a standard polarizer, though cheaper, still rotates.

Originally posted by jellyoooo:


if its sunset situation then anyway you dont want to shoot portraits or moving objects with PL coz it bring down F stop like 1-2 so it better off without in low light..


Yes, depending on the position, you can lose 1.5 stops. In lower light, this can be a problem when the subject tends to move.
08/15/2005 10:55:30 AM · #12
Thanks for all of your help, I took the pictures without a polorizer and used the diff camera WB setting, i like the outcome of the pictures i will be posting them soon and hope to get some Critiques on them,

08/15/2005 11:14:34 AM · #13
Bracketing with different EV would also work. You could merge the best parts of each photo together. Although illegal in the challenges you could achieve a better exposure.

Basically if you have to squint your eyes, is when you would need a polarizer.

Message edited by author 2005-08-15 11:16:12.
08/15/2005 11:28:52 AM · #14
Good 77mm Circular Polarizers are at least US$100, there is no point putting a crappy $20 piece of glass in front of a $1500 24-70 f/2.8L
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/24/2025 09:55:50 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/24/2025 09:55:50 AM EDT.