In camera noise reduction is superior to after-the-fact noise reduction.
The way it works in the 20D is this: If you take a long exposure (1 second or more), then after the exposure is done, the camera closes the shutter, but continues to watch the CCD for the same amount of time. Then it subtracts out the noise that it gets during that 1 second of "darkness".
So, if you take a 1 second exposure, the shutter closes and the CCD runs for another second. If you take a 15 second exposure, then you have a 15 second wait after the shutter closes before your image emerges on the LCD. And so on.
So basically, the camera is just trying to filter out known "noise" in the system.
After the fact, your editor has to try to guess what is noise from what is detail. Any type of noise removal at this stage must also, by necessity, remove detail. The trick is to try to remove just enough noise and leave as much detail as possible behind by analyzing the "pattern" in the noise and removing the patter.
Now, to be fair... even noise in the CCD can land on top of detail. And thus, in-camera noise reduction also removes detail. It's just that, in-camera it's less of a "guess" as to what is noise versus detail.
And yes, even when shooting RAW the "dark frame" subtraction still occurs.
Message edited by author 2005-07-26 17:11:42. |