| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/10/2005 05:50:51 PM · #1 |
Hi all,
yes I know this has probably been asked before, but I'll be honest, I am too damn lazy to search and read through the posts, so will pose this question.
In an ideal world I would buy the Canon 24-70 2.8L, however real-life© gets in the way of spending that much money on a lens so have read that the Tamron SP AF28-75/2.8 XR Di LD is a great alternative. Now when I bought my flash I got the Sigma 500 DG Super and struck gold (couldnt afford the 550EX), now if I buy the Tamron, am I looking at another third party company victory. Comments please.. thanks. |
|
|
|
06/10/2005 06:06:06 PM · #2 |
I've yet to come across someone who is not happy with this lens. I don't think many will try to claim that it surpasses the 24-70 in quality*, but I don't suppose that's what you are asking anyways.
*edit: I seem to remember making a similar statement before and scalvert claiming that it gets very close in quality (but maybe my memory is bad).
Message edited by author 2005-06-10 18:08:50.
|
|
|
|
06/10/2005 06:09:18 PM · #3 |
The image quality from the Tamron will be very close to that of the Canon. Considering the price difference, it's a no brainer. =)
You won't be disappointed with this lens.
|
|
|
|
06/10/2005 07:05:03 PM · #4 |
I agree with the rest - I have TWO of the Tamrons - and from what I know, the quality isn't much different, if at all, to the 24-70L.
|
|
|
|
06/10/2005 07:07:07 PM · #5 |
I don't actually own one (yet), but I think the Tamron is an excellent lens for the money.
Having said that, there is a reason the Canon is three times the price.
|
|
|
|
06/10/2005 07:11:42 PM · #6 |
This Tamron is a sweet lens, as I'm sure I've posted previous in the numerous other threads comparing these two lenses :o) The lens virtually lives on my camera, and rarely gets switched to any other. The only advantages of the Canon 24-70 that I can see over the Tamron are a slightly more neutral colour cast (the Tamron is a little warm, istr), a more conventional zoom twist direction (reverse twist confuses some ppl), it's a touch wider (24 vs 28), and is weather-sealed. If you think all that is worth the 3x asking price, go for the Canon, otherwise the Tamron is a winner hands down...
|
|
|
|
06/10/2005 08:02:53 PM · #7 |
The Tamron is a fantastic lens. Here's an example of what it can produce:
The main thing, other than what has been said here so far, is that their QC is a little lacking, and you might need to go through a few before you get one that is spot on sharp. I bought one about 1 year ago, and returned it because it was considerably soft. I gave it another try a few months ago, and got a real gem. Very sharp even at 2.8.
I say go for it. I can't imagine spending the extra $$$.
|
|
|
|
06/10/2005 08:15:44 PM · #8 |
|
|
|
06/10/2005 08:46:30 PM · #9 |
Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L examples
   
Message edited by author 2005-06-10 20:49:29. |
|
|
|
06/10/2005 09:41:52 PM · #10 |
You will be extremely happy with the Tamron. I adore mine!!! Samples here if you're interested. :o)
|
|
|
|
06/10/2005 10:56:46 PM · #11 |
I dont mean to hijack this thread but im trying to decide between the tamron 28-75 and a sigma 18-200 (or 18-125)
I havent found any full reviews for the sigma 18-200 but I know the 28-75 kicks ass in terms of image quality. But the extra zoom on the sigma is so tempting. Anyone know where i can find a review of the sigma and how good the image quality is on it?
|
|
|
|
06/10/2005 11:09:52 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by brianlh:
I seem to remember... scalvert claiming that it gets very close in quality [to the Canon 24-70L]. |
You remember correctly. My last three ribbon winners were taken with that lens. I found a lens review at one point that listed the Canon at 4.2 and the Tamron at 4.1 (or something like that). Given the price difference, I'll take it! |
|
|
|
06/10/2005 11:10:52 PM · #13 |
It's hard to find....they seem to be out of stock every place I've looked at!
|
|
|
|
06/10/2005 11:49:45 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by nico_blue:
I dont mean to hijack this thread but im trying to decide between the tamron 28-75 and a sigma 18-200 (or 18-125)
I havent found any full reviews for the sigma 18-200 but I know the 28-75 kicks ass in terms of image quality. But the extra zoom on the sigma is so tempting. Anyone know where i can find a review of the sigma and how good the image quality is on it? |
You'll lose a lot of image quality by going with such long zoom lenses as the Sigma 18-200mm. No need to read any reviews to know that. Even the $2200 Canon 28-300mm L doesn't have high enough image quality for my taste, let alone a lowly $400 Sigma 18-200mm!!
Get the Tamron ... |
|
|
|
06/10/2005 11:50:30 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by colyla:
It's hard to find....they seem to be out of stock every place I've looked at! |
My local shop ordered it in for me and I got it within the week.
|
|
|
|
06/11/2005 12:16:29 AM · #16 |
I have had my Tamron for a while. It is a great lens. You can't go wrong with it.
|
|
|
|
06/11/2005 01:11:46 AM · #17 |
i just ordered mine on amazon... it looks like its going to be quite a wait, estimated ship date is mid july. I guess i'll just have to manage the kit lens till then.
|
|
|
|
06/11/2005 02:08:42 AM · #18 |
Probably the best bang for the bucks in the midrange zoom. The Canon 24-70 f2.8L is optically better but only you'll be able to decide if it's $1000 better or not.
|
|
|
|
06/11/2005 10:28:48 AM · #19 |
I used my Sigma 24-60 F2.8 last night at Club Grand Opening.
Check photos HERE !
PS
If I had one vore Vodka,I would pick-up that girl with hat !
Message edited by author 2005-06-11 10:30:24. |
|
|
|
06/11/2005 10:38:59 AM · #20 |
Originally posted by pitsaman:
I used my Sigma 24-60 F2.8 last night at Club Grand Opening.
Check photos HERE !
PS
If I had one vore Vodka,I would pick-up that girl with hat ! |
I think maybe another 3 :)
Impressive shots,no flash Kosta ?
|
|
|
|
06/11/2005 10:45:59 AM · #21 |
Originally posted by pitsaman:
PS
If I had one vore Vodka,I would pick-up that girl with hat ! |
The one on stage??
Well, I never knew.... =)
Nice shots.
|
|
|
|
06/12/2005 02:09:59 AM · #22 |
Originally posted by cbeller:
Originally posted by colyla:
It's hard to find....they seem to be out of stock every place I've looked at! |
My local shop ordered it in for me and I got it within the week. |
Is your local shop a chain or privately owned? It's on backorder through B&H. Hmmm...I think there may be a Ritz in the mall. I'll check that one online. This lens interests me, especially looking at the photos and researching the info online.
~Colette~
|
|
|
|
06/13/2005 09:44:08 PM · #23 |
Checked local stores in LA area for this lens. Retail at $400. Considering the tax, I would wait for it to come in stock in b&h. After buying this lens, what do you guys do with the kit lens (18-55 one)?
Message edited by author 2005-06-13 21:45:11. |
|
|
|
06/13/2005 10:44:28 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by chenmorning:
After buying this lens, what do you guys do with the kit lens (18-55 one)? |
It makes a great paperweight! LOL!
|
|
|
|
06/14/2005 12:15:46 AM · #25 |
I keep mine for any wide angle shots I need. It came in handy when I had to shoot a large family photo indoors and didn't have enough room to back up.
Edit...err well, my Nikon kit lens that is.
Message edited by author 2005-06-14 00:17:09.
|
|
