| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/23/2005 08:33:51 PM · #1 |
null
Just found this news item.
|
|
|
|
05/23/2005 08:42:00 PM · #2 |
Yowza... If that ever becomes reality, say goodbye to cameras the size of dSLRs. They'll only need to be big enough to hold the memory card and the sensor...
Robt.
|
|
|
|
05/23/2005 08:43:25 PM · #3 |
| weird, that would be cool though...think about it, you could have a 400mm lens that doesn't need its own tripod. On a similar note: one of my photo magazines a while back had someone talking about how they should incoorporate a range finder type item to the camera that would record the distance of different objects within a picture, that way if you wanted to change your DOF you could open the software and say blur everything beyond 3" That would be cool. |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 08:44:05 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
Yowza... If that ever becomes reality, say goodbye to cameras the size of dSLRs. They'll only need to be big enough to hold the memory card and the sensor...
Robt. |
Solar powered are they? ;)
|
|
|
|
05/23/2005 08:44:36 PM · #5 |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 08:45:07 PM · #6 |
Hmmm... before that's applied to cameras, they should work on the glasses, etc.
It would probably take a long while before the technology is perfected enough to make the lens as reliable as a standard one, so my thought is that our trusty SLRs will be around for a while longer. |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 08:45:30 PM · #7 |
Im still waiting on my "Jetson Car" and the highway in the sky
|
|
|
|
05/23/2005 08:46:06 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by Konador:
Originally posted by bear_music:
Yowza... If that ever becomes reality, say goodbye to cameras the size of dSLRs. They'll only need to be big enough to hold the memory card and the sensor...
Robt. |
Solar powered are they? ;) |
I do believe it runs on a gas generator. |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 08:46:29 PM · #9 |
Two car batteries.text
And it's the price of a Porshe (or two)! |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 08:46:35 PM · #10 |
| strange. the bottleneck of a cell phone camera lens is it's sensor, not it's lens........ |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 09:03:40 PM · #11 |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 09:18:13 PM · #12 |
Bigger sensor = more accurate photon count = less noise = better picture. I don't imagine this technology replacing any pro equipment any time soon...
|
|
|
|
05/23/2005 09:29:33 PM · #13 |
could allow for much much smaller lenses. I'm not buying it though
|
|
|
|
05/23/2005 09:30:01 PM · #14 |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 09:44:41 PM · #15 |
LOL! Those images are funny:))
|
|
|
|
05/23/2005 09:57:15 PM · #16 |
| I'd just love to have a cellphone with 22Mpixel CMOS and a 17-400 mm L type lens :) |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 09:58:18 PM · #17 |
| It's great, now they can make a cell phone that takes crystal clear photos. I have an idea....how about a cell phone that makes crystal clear phone calls? |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 10:05:26 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by TommyMoe21:
It's great, now they can make a cell phone that takes crystal clear photos. I have an idea....how about a cell phone that makes crystal clear phone calls? |
Who would want that? |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 10:09:48 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by Spitfire:
Originally posted by TommyMoe21:
It's great, now they can make a cell phone that takes crystal clear photos. I have an idea....how about a cell phone that makes crystal clear phone calls? |
Who would want that? |
The pizza guy wants you to have that! I can't stand cell phones. People try and order all the time on their cells and they blame you when the call gets dropped or you get their order wrong cause their damn phone don't have a wire and you can't hear but every third word they say...
|
|
|
|
05/23/2005 10:42:38 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by DanSig:
I'd just love to have a cellphone with 22Mpixel CMOS and a 17-400 mm L type lens :) |
nah thats petty
i would want a 1-3000mm F/0.2 L IS DO USM attached
with softfocus and fisheye option
and ISO 1
Message edited by author 2005-05-23 23:03:05. |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 10:55:44 PM · #21 |
| Be sure and turn the vibrate function off or you will get phone shake. |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 11:01:28 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by Donaldo:
Be sure and turn the vibrate function off or you will get phone shake. |
That would be fun to play with... oh wait that sounds wrong.
|
|
|
|
05/23/2005 11:18:23 PM · #23 |
How about this:
1-3000mm f/0.2 DO ALL FOR ME |
|
|
|
05/23/2005 11:26:26 PM · #24 |
How can you adjust the focal length without moving the lens?
|
|
|
|
05/23/2005 11:37:20 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by Fetor:
Originally posted by DanSig:
I'd just love to have a cellphone with 22Mpixel CMOS and a 17-400 mm L type lens :) |
nah thats petty
i would want a 1-3000mm F/0.2 L IS DO USM attached
with softfocus and fisheye option
and ISO 1 |
I wonder what you could do with an F0.2 lens...smoothe bokeh behind mountains, perhaps?
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/16/2025 09:41:58 PM EDT.
