| Author | Thread |
|
|
04/01/2005 11:16:41 PM · #1 |
I thought it was Funny as hell, now I'm calling her out on it..
I submitted much worse even though this a prank challenge, I think she shoulda entered..
So, she is gonna be "pissed" I showed it, but I found humor in it..
|
|
|
|
04/01/2005 11:20:16 PM · #2 |
You think it's funny b/c you didn't take it! LMAO
Well, having children who eat grapes and play with ducks sufficed my boredom.
Thanks for IM'ing me through it BUZZROCK
~The Beth |
|
|
|
04/01/2005 11:33:23 PM · #3 |
Would have been DQ'd - the rules specifically state one rubber ducky.
I played out in the warmth instead. of course i had no grapes - well, that's my excuse anyway.
|
|
|
|
04/01/2005 11:42:41 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by Prof_Fate:
Would have been DQ'd - the rules specifically state one rubber ducky.
I played out in the warmth instead. of course i had no grapes - well, that's my excuse anyway. |
Someone from the site council pointed out in another thread that the photo needs to contain all the elements listed, but may also contain other elements. A second rubber ducky would be such an additional element, and, from at least one SC members perspective, be within the rules.
Not that it matters now. |
|
|
|
04/01/2005 11:45:11 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by samtrundle:
Originally posted by Prof_Fate:
Would have been DQ'd - the rules specifically state one rubber ducky.
I played out in the warmth instead. of course i had no grapes - well, that's my excuse anyway. |
Someone from the site council pointed out in another thread that the photo needs to contain all the elements listed, but may also contain other elements. A second rubber ducky would be such an additional element, and, from at least one SC members perspective, be within the rules.
Not that it matters now. |
lol.. no. It can contain other elements, but not if those elements break the established limit set in the rules. Thus an extra ducky, when *one* is the established limit, would almost certainly result in a DQ, as per the rules.
So would adding an extra grape.
|
|
|
|
04/01/2005 11:51:31 PM · #6 |
rules and description are two different things.. breaking the rules is one thing - but not 'interpreting' the description properly is an entirely different thing! to each his/her own :)
(didn't enter)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/05/2025 10:01:17 PM EDT.
