| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 07:38:45 PM · #1 | 
		| | Hello all.  I'm a newbie here, and have started taking more & more photos over the last few months with my nifty new camera.  It's great being able to fire away & not have to spend all that $$ on development!  I'm at the point where I feel naked without my little PowerShot.  I really want to become the best photographer I can be and have spent quite a while over the last few days browsing this site & some of the amazing photos taken by the artists here.  To me it would be just about the coolest thing ever if some of the talent here would take a moment to comment on some of my pics.  I'm starting with this one, as it uses a PhotoShop technique I just learned by reading a tutorial on this site.  I am VERY thick-skinned, so don't worry about bruising my ego! 
  | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 07:50:04 PM · #2 | 
		| | Contrast is very nice. Desat works. I feel like I want to see a closer crop of the girls, but then we wouldn't see at a beach. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 08:08:44 PM · #3 | 
		| | I like the pic but why is a part of the hand on the girl with the yellow bucket so dark ? looks like you used burn tool set way too hard, there is also a spot on her knee. 
 if you would crop 5/8 of an inch of the right side of te picture then composition would be better, the girls are too cloce to the center of the image.. rule of thirds you know ;)
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 08:16:57 PM · #4 | 
		| | First thing I noticed Strike, is you have a very good eye. If you are new to photography, you have a great natural talent. I agree with Faidoi, the contrast is very good. Top quality. The two things that I really want to point out is your adherance to the "rule of thirds". Also, and this is a point that I never think about but it is a good one, notice how the horizon is just above the tallest child's head. You could have so easily had the horizon just a bit lower which would have had the negative result of cutting through the child's head or body. Now for the desat. I don't care for the effect but I think that I'm in the minority so don't listen to me. I would be much more inclined to purchase this image without the colored buckets. :)
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 08:22:13 PM · #5 | 
		| | My one suggestion would be to crop the image from the left and the right to leave just the 1/3rd containing the girls. I find that selective desaturation works a lot better when the colored object is substantial portion of the picture. 
 Otherwise I like it a lot.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 08:36:50 PM · #6 | 
		| | I like the clean composition. It's simple and effective. I'm not a huge fan of the selective desaturation though because I don't think the buckets themselves make interesting subjects. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 09:25:57 PM · #7 | 
		| | Awesome, thanks folks! 
 So, "The Rule of Thirds", I've seen this before & I see how a crop in could solve this while also getting a better view of my girls.
 
 Joanns, such a great point about the horizon & getting a negative result!  I'll certainly take advantage of that, it makes such good sense, I wish I'd seen it at the time.
 
 DanSig, the burns you see are shadows from my smaller girl onto the bigger one as the sun was setting.
 
 So we're sort-of split on the desaturation thing.  I like it.
 
 Thanks for comments thus far!
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 09:29:34 PM · #8 | 
		| | What a lovely shot of the girls.  I'm not a fan of the selective desat, but I really like everything else about it.  I'd like to see the whole thing in color. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 09:41:50 PM · #9 | 
		| | | Originally posted by jpochard: What a lovely shot of the girls.  I'm not a fan of the selective desat, but I really like everything else about it.  I'd like to see the whole thing in color.
 | 
 
 Thanks!  Here's the colour version:
 
 
  | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 09:44:27 PM · #10 | 
		| | for the record, I like the selective desat better. 
 drake
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 09:50:20 PM · #11 | 
		| | | Originally posted by fstopopen: for the record, I like the selective desat better.
 
 drake
 | 
 
 Thanks.
 
 I'm picturing a dodgeball grudge-match between desaturators & non-desaturators.  Gasoline-soaked balls could be used, which might make for some good time-exposure shots! ;-)
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2005 11:53:27 PM · #12 | 
		| | Selective desat is a great tool for making a statement.  I don't understand what statement you are trying to make with this example... 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/28/2005 12:22:04 AM · #13 | 
		| | | Originally posted by Strikeslip: 
 | Originally posted by fstopopen: for the record, I like the selective desat better.
 
 drake
 | 
 
 Thanks.
 
 I'm picturing a dodgeball grudge-match between desaturators & non-desaturators.  Gasoline-soaked balls could be used, which might make for some good time-exposure shots! ;-)
 | 
 
 No way, don't do that.  It hurts really bad.
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 03:41:49 AM EDT.