Author | Thread |
|
02/26/2005 11:35:08 AM · #1 |
In this case anyway. :-)
Thanks to those in this thread who 'pressured' me into buying the Canon 50mm f/1.8! It came this morning and here are a few pics. They are nothing great, but I haven't left the house yet. I did not adjust the colors or sharpness in these. They have been resized only.
I already love the shallow dof and can't wait to really put this to use.
Thanks guys.
Jen
edit: For those interested, the statues are Hummels, that's my pooch, and the pigs were purchased in the Caribean and are carved from a coconut.
Message edited by author 2005-02-26 11:36:20.
|
|
|
02/26/2005 11:43:46 AM · #2 |
I don't think it was peer preasure unless you took it that way. More like good advice.
|
|
|
02/26/2005 02:45:46 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by nsbca7: I don't think it was peer preasure unless you took it that way. More like good advice. |
I think we should stick with Peer Pressure. That way we can get her to by more glass, and send it to us..... :-)
Congrats on the new glass Jen, you'll really like what you get out of it..
Cheers, Me.
|
|
|
02/26/2005 03:12:00 PM · #4 |
thats one of my favorite lenses. good choice.
|
|
|
02/26/2005 03:19:25 PM · #5 |
I bought the 50 F1.8 a few months ago, and have barely used my kit lens since. Looking back on it, I wonder if I should have bought the F1.4 for its construction, and 2/3rds of a stop faster. For $70, it's unbeatable. |
|
|
02/26/2005 04:16:32 PM · #6 |
nsbca7: Yes, good advice. I was only joking when I wrote peer pressure.
Chris: lol, ain't gonna happen! :-P I can't wait to go out and shoot real stuff with it. I'm sure it will meet my expectations.
Evan: Thanks.
Andrew: I'm glad you are enjoying your lens. The f1.4 is considerably more expensive, though. Like you said, for $70 you can't go wrong.
|
|
|
02/26/2005 04:24:07 PM · #7 |
somewhere i remember hearing talk which ones more expensive the f/1.8 or f 1.4?
|
|
|
02/26/2005 04:25:30 PM · #8 |
The F1.4 is more exspensive.
|
|
|
02/26/2005 04:28:06 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Fleximus: The F1.4 is more exspensive. |
Correct - because it is the faster lens. The smaller the f-number, the faster the lens and the more expensive...in most situations. The 50mm f/1.8 is sort of an oddity at $70/$75.
|
|
|
02/26/2005 04:30:47 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by ButterflySis: The 50mm f/1.8 is sort of an oddity at $70/$75. |
And brilliant
|
|
|
02/26/2005 09:39:33 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by Fleximus: Originally posted by ButterflySis: The 50mm f/1.8 is sort of an oddity at $70/$75. |
And brilliant |
And I suspect it's a 'loss leader'. ie: They sell them at a loss to get you hooked on better quality glass... The differential (8x) between the 1.4 and 1.8 will I suspect be partially due to marketing decisions, not just the technology used to make the lens..
Cheers, Me.
|
|
|
02/26/2005 10:52:45 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by KiwiChris: Originally posted by Fleximus: Originally posted by ButterflySis: The 50mm f/1.8 is sort of an oddity at $70/$75. |
And brilliant |
And I suspect it's a 'loss leader'. ie: They sell them at a loss to get you hooked on better quality glass... The differential (8x) between the 1.4 and 1.8 will I suspect be partially due to marketing decisions, not just the technology used to make the lens..
Cheers, Me. |
Works for me...now I want the 70-200mm 4L cause once you take a sharp picture out of the cam and don't have to work it up...your hooked.
Butterflysis: I love the minitures...awesome shots especially the first one. |
|
|
02/26/2005 11:41:22 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by awpollard: Butterflysis: I love the minitures...awesome shots especially the first one. |
Thanks!
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/14/2025 07:55:15 PM EDT.