Author | Thread |
|
01/10/2005 12:31:11 AM · #1 |
Take your best photo of a child or children (no adults in the photo). |
|
|
01/10/2005 12:33:41 AM · #2 |
I would LOVE that one!!! I shouldn't have a hard time finding a model!
|
|
|
01/10/2005 01:44:21 AM · #3 |
I should say not Parrothead.. lol
I wouldn't have a tough time either.. I'm all for this challenge!!! Finally one where I can submit a shot of a subject I love without worrying about the "I hate children" vote.
|
|
|
01/10/2005 02:02:40 AM · #4 |
Wonder how many dogs we'd get, with the statement "But he's my BABY!"?
jejejeâ¢
Robt.
|
|
|
01/10/2005 02:04:30 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by bear_music: Wonder how many dogs we'd get, with the statement "But he's my BABY!"?
jejejeâ¢
Robt. |
hehe...perhaps I should specify "human" children??? |
|
|
01/10/2005 02:05:29 AM · #6 |
MY kids are both over 24, can I use them? Need an age range too, maybe... LOLOL
Robt.
|
|
|
01/10/2005 02:10:23 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by bear_music: MY kids are both over 24, can I use them? Need an age range too, maybe... LOLOL
Robt. |
He did specify no adults in the photo.. which would eliminate 18+..
however, there's the whole .. are teenagers children? debate thing.
so.. yah.. birth to 12 years maybe?
|
|
|
01/10/2005 02:12:03 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by bear_music: Wonder how many dogs we'd get, with the statement "But he's my BABY!"?
jejejeâ¢
Robt. |
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a- bitch."
--Jack Nicholson |
|
|
01/10/2005 02:16:35 AM · #9 |
I think if it's specified "no adults" then the photographer would take his/her own chance at deciding what the viewers will consider adult. Once you get into the 12+ range, you can find some very adult-looking "kids." Actually, even younger any more, and that's a shame, imo.
I don't think anything beyond "no adults" needs to be specified. |
|
|
01/10/2005 02:19:46 AM · #10 |
Ah, good point, Pochard. I stand corrected...
Robt.
|
|
|
01/10/2005 04:57:52 AM · #11 |
The top 5 entries will obviously have to submit their original photo for exif data validation ....
And the child/children's birth certificates for age validation ;)
|
|
|
01/10/2005 04:58:53 AM · #12 |
In the UK, there's currently a lot of controversy over the tendency for innocent photographers to get locked up in a cell over night and have their photographic and computer equipment confiscated for a few weeks while the police run searches for illegal images. This can happen when any photographer points their camera at someone else's kid in a public place. The general advice on this subject in the UK seems to be not to take photos of other people's children. I think this is a dangerous challenge subject for those of us without children. |
|
|
01/10/2005 05:10:09 AM · #13 |
Yeah, Bobster, I was thinking just that. Not a good challenge for the mature members such as I who lack grandchildren to serve as quasi-willing subjects. I'm unlikely to be in this one. UNless I can submit a sonograph? But no, I didn't TAKE that...
Run this challenge again anytime after 3 months from now, folks. Thanx.
jejejeâ¢
Robt.
|
|
|
01/10/2005 05:11:00 AM · #14 |
Originally posted by BobsterLobster: In the UK, there's currently a lot of controversy over the tendency for innocent photographers to get locked up in a cell over night and have their photographic and computer equipment confiscated for a few weeks while the police run searches for illegal images. This can happen when any photographer points their camera at someone else's kid in a public place. The general advice on this subject in the UK seems to be not to take photos of other people's children. I think this is a dangerous challenge subject for those of us without children. |
I don't want to hijack the thread, so I'll take my thoughts over here: //www.dpchallenge.com/forum.php?action=read&FORUM_THREAD_ID=159688
|
|
|
01/10/2005 07:48:09 AM · #15 |
Not a good challenge idea in my opinion.
I have trouble getting my kids (17,16 and 10) anywhere in front of a lens, and RobsterLobster has pointed out the pitfalls of 'candid' photography in the UK.
|
|
|
01/10/2005 08:42:32 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by Falc: Not a good challenge idea in my opinion.
I have trouble getting my kids (17,16 and 10) anywhere in front of a lens, and RobsterLobster has pointed out the pitfalls of 'candid' photography in the UK. |
Ask a friend to borrow theirs for a day. I do it all the time. Most parents are more than willing to get rid of their kids for a while if they know and trust you. Some don't even need those requirements.
Message edited by author 2005-01-10 20:42:44.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/12/2025 08:24:04 AM EDT.