| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/29/2004 11:49:07 PM · #1 |
Take a look at this shot from Canon's new 1Ds Mark II. This is a direct-from-camera shot, resized down from 16.7MP. Shot at ISO 3200, with only natural light from a window in the ceiling, 1/80th second, Æ’/5.0, Canon 100-400 at 135mm.
Pretty darn impressive for ISO 3200 I'd say... |
|
|
|
11/29/2004 11:53:08 PM · #2 |
I knew this camera would be awesome. I doubt I'll buy anything other than that camera. But at 8000 bucks without a lens that will be a long, long, long time.
Joe.
|
|
|
|
11/29/2004 11:54:11 PM · #3 |
That looks around about ISO 800 on a 10D. Amazing. How much better is the 1Ds to the 1D? If I had to choose between the two I'd have a very hard time deciding.
|
|
|
|
11/29/2004 11:54:27 PM · #4 |
That's awesome.
Now I only need 7994 more dollars and I can get one....
|
|
|
|
11/29/2004 11:55:07 PM · #5 |
Ya, but if you can afford a 1Ds Mark II then you can probably afford a room full of strobes too - and a small army of helpers to carry them around for you wherever you go. :)
|
|
|
|
11/30/2004 12:00:14 AM · #6 |
| That is one amazing camera. I am hoping there is a rush to buy the 1Ds Mark II and then people will be selling off their old 1Ds cameras on Ebay. |
|
|
|
11/30/2004 12:02:57 AM · #7 |
That looks like my D70 at ISO 200!! lol. Oh well, sigh.
Well, the good news is cameras like this will probably cost $2,000 or so in a couple of years. But then we'll all want the 30MP camera. |
|
|
|
11/30/2004 02:04:48 AM · #8 |
Damn...
And I am impressed by the low noise 20D performance.
You don't have the full image do you? I'd be interested in a 100% crop of, say, the top left corner of his glasses showing a bit of frame, and a bit of the tinted glass...
Impressive.
|
|
|
|
11/30/2004 05:03:41 PM · #9 |
Amazing! I shoot at 800 and 1600 quite a lot with my 300D but I now need, no want, one of these babies. Just need to win the lottery and its mine, all mine!!
:-)
|
|
|
|
11/30/2004 06:07:49 PM · #10 |
looks like they mis-focused to me - the hat, and jacket collar seem to be the crispest.
|
|
|
|
11/30/2004 06:25:30 PM · #11 |
Hmmm, I get a lot of noise--more than I expected when I bought the camera, at ISO 400!
Could there be something wrong with it? (I shoot in RAW).
Anyone want to do a test of sorts with me, comparing same shots? (E.g., same lens etc. I have the 50 1.8 we probably all have in common.) |
|
|
|
11/30/2004 06:29:40 PM · #12 |
| Forget 3200 I just wish Nikon would come out with a ISO 25 or 50. I'm sick of using ND filters. When I shot film I never shot faster than 50 color or 100 B&W. ISO 200 is just too fast. |
|
|
|
11/30/2004 07:07:39 PM · #13 |
I suppose the fact that it's downsized almost 3:1 in linear resolution is helping average the noise out, but still, WOW. Unbelievable at ISO 3200.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 05:06:53 PM EDT.
