DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> 0.42x Super wide angle for Canon
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 6 of 6, (reverse)
AuthorThread
11/13/2004 11:13:33 PM · #1
Has anyone ever tried this type of lens? I can't decide if it's a cheap piece of junk or worth adding for the (few) super-wide angle shots I might want to take...

//cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=30066&item=3852944544&rd=1
11/13/2004 11:24:39 PM · #2
Personally (amateur that I am) I figure there is always the option of stitching/panoramas. I would say use your money for something else.
11/13/2004 11:33:37 PM · #3
It probably is junk. I think i'm going to get a 17-35 Tamron Di which is significantly less than the Canon L and is very good. Of course it's much more than one of those converters.
11/14/2004 12:34:13 PM · #4
I have something similar for my point-and-shoot camera and it is basically a wide-angle filter. If you took your lense and attached a red filter, the lense would see everything with a red tint. This thing seems to do the same sort of thing, in that it allows your lense to see more of everything, but the lense still operates in the same way.

I think it is misleading for them to say its got AF because if it is a converter filter as it looks to be, then your camera is what is providing the AF, and this thing isn't doing anything accept changing your field of view (which is still kinda cool...I love my wide-angle converter and use it often). As far as the price goes, it's not bad. I paid $40 for my dinky little filter, and it only has two elements.

One caveat is expect serious amounts of vignetting depending upon the lense that this is mounted to. On my camera, when the lense is set to its widest view, it picks up the inside of the filter giving me rounded corners on the shot. Granted, I still see much, much more with the converter than the camera by itself, even with these dark corners, so I just crop them out and go about my business.

If you use this converter to shoot buildings, trees...well, almost anything, you'll notice a fish-eye effect. You can fix it is photoshop with some add-on barrel distortion correction filters.
11/14/2004 10:50:24 PM · #5
thanks for the suggestions. I think i'm going to just go for it and buy it. I'll post some pics as soon as i try it out...
11/14/2004 10:58:53 PM · #6
NNNOOOO don't bye that. i tryed it out when i was in lanzerote. on my Sony f707 and it was nothing special actualy i didn't like the results my opinion is by a new lense no adaptation its crappy. but its your call. i don't understand very much of lenses by now but hoping to. but i know when i don't like the results. just my opinion.

Message edited by author 2004-11-14 23:00:24.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 05:54:35 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 05:54:35 AM EDT.