Northern Siberia is just about the coldest spot on the earth. Yet this was not always so. This area was never covered by ice in the ice age. There was life here and plants that are no longer present. But ponder on the following: in 1799 frozen bodies of mammoths were found. Sledge dogs were eager to eat this flesh unharmed. But wait: the big point here is that these creatures were frozen while eating because the plant food was still in their mouth!
This is a very big implication which we can not gloss over. This flies in the face of the Darwin model where changes occur slowly over time. We all know that when an animal dies putrefaction begins shortly after. These animals did not have the chance to finish their eating, let alone rotting away. They were suddeny frozen.
Now look at the formation of the Himalaya mountains. Examine the area and you will conclude from its marine fossils that these mointains were once under the sea. They are currently going through another change.
The point being made is not a point being taught in schools because to teach the truth: that the earth is subject to cataclysm from many different internal and external directions, would debunk the crap the schools are now teaching.
Let me illustrate this further: as you all who are interested in mother earth know, the earth consist of a stony shell: the lithosphere which consists of igneous rock, like granite and basalt. This is then covered with sedimentary rock whis is deposited by water. With the propagation of seismic waves we estimate about a 2000 mile thick layer. Of course, on the basis of the gravitational effect of mountain masses as per the theory of isostasy, this brings the shell to be only about 60 miles thick. What is important here is that the deep strata of igneous rock contain no sign of fossils life. Incased in the sedimentary rock are skeletons of marine and land animals. Not infrequently igneous rock has shot up right through the sedimentary even to the point of assuming the upper position.
Why all the above: consider what we have here. We have unresolved activity which may originate for the core of the earth. We have proof that sudden changes of temparature have taken place without warning which have frozen animals while eating. A place where there was once vegatation is now under ice and this place was never subjected to the ice age.
We know that our atmosphere is subjected to pleasant and destructive changes. Something has suddenly frozen or local weather conditions change from cold to warm.
Please show me the posters that the environmental wackos would have displayed prior to the freezing of Siberia and before continents sank and rose.
The earth is subject to many variables which include its varying distance on its orbit around the sun. The gallaxy is also hurling through space and the entire structure is subject to wobles which affect not only the terrestial axis, which is reponsible for your seasonal changes, but disturbance from other gravitational forces which include all the bodies in the design of this little piece of the universe.
The above does not guarantee you a fixed weather pattern nor the possibility of upheavels which may bring unclement weather to any part. Everything is subject to affect the entire picture. A decrease in carbon dioxide will have a detrimental effect. There is cause and effect of which we have no say so whatsoever.
This brings us to earth warming. Look at the facts and even if you are not a scientist where is the proof that any is taking place as a result of your actions? A sudden dispension of solar hot spots will have another adverse effect. What I am saying is that the picture is too big to be grasped by any generation. These cycles of upheavels are part of the mystery in the fabric of the universe. The time lines go so far back and what is human recording as of now? A mere two thousand years. Do you know how tiny a number this is in the face of our origin and that of the clay of the earth and the universe? It is not enough for anyone who wishes to uphold his credibility into the history books. There is no sufficient data to form an intelligent decision and only those with an agenda will find it in themselves to be disingenuous because they know they are addressing an ignorant audience.
To believe that we are the cause does not explain the infamous ice ages. The above mentioned sudden freezing nor the very igneous rock shooting past the outer layer. The rising and falling continents.
Like I said earlier, the concerned scientist are addressing idiots because what they espouse is false and if they believe the trash they are selling then they are either misguided or soldiers of the wacky left. If you lived in old Siberia and these scientist told you that were causing the eminent freezing spell coming because you used fire to eat you may have believed him. Is it not funny or what.
The question is why is this being done. It is a simple political ploy at the heart of liberalism. It wants to take the issue of the salvation of the planet on to themselves. But look at them, what can do except play on your emotions. They are selling you the Brooklyn Bridge. Oh, how nice to associate myself with a caring political side that like Superman is going to save the world. I do not know which one to pity more the scientist or the subject they are selling this bridge to.
Message edited by author 2004-11-12 02:15:36. |
